2
$\begingroup$

Let $X_i, i = 1, 2, 3,$ be independent exponential random variables with rates $\lambda_i, i = 1,2,3.$

How does one derive the following:

$$\mathbb P \{\min(X_1, X_2, X_3) = X_1\} = \frac{\lambda_1}{\lambda_1 +\lambda_2 + \lambda_3}?$$

I see this used all of the time, and I'm familiar with the fact that

$$\mathbb P \{X_1 < X_2\} = \frac{\lambda_1}{\lambda_2 +\lambda_2},$$

which I assume is property one uses to get from the latter to the former; but, I've been working with the definitions, and whatnot, with no luck. Any help here would be appreciated. Thanks!

$\endgroup$
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ For every positive $x$, $$P(X_2>x,X_3>x)=e^{-(\lambda_2+\lambda_3)x},$$ hence, by independence, $$P(X_2>X_1,X_3>X_1)=E(e^{-(\lambda_2+\lambda_3)X_1})=\ldots$$ $\endgroup$ – Did Feb 27 '16 at 20:03
  • $\begingroup$ Well, $E(e^{-(\lambda_2+\lambda_3)X_1}) = M_{X_1}(-\lambda_2 - \lambda_3)$, i.e., the moment-generating function, if that's what you're getting at... $\endgroup$ – thisisourconcerndude Feb 27 '16 at 20:09
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ ...And this evaluates to? $\endgroup$ – Did Feb 27 '16 at 20:11
  • $\begingroup$ Ah, I see... it's just $\int_{0}^{\infty}e^{-(\lambda_2+\lambda_3)x_1}\lambda_1e^{-\lambda_1x_1}dx_1 = \lambda_1\int_{0}^{\infty}e^{-(\lambda_1 + \lambda_2+\lambda_3)x_1}dx_1=\frac{-\lambda_1}{\lambda_1 + \lambda_2 + \lambda_3}(0 - 1) = \frac{\lambda_1}{\lambda_1 + \lambda_2 + \lambda_3}$. Thanks! $\endgroup$ – thisisourconcerndude Feb 27 '16 at 20:25
3
$\begingroup$

Observe that $P(\min(X_1,X_2,X_3)=X_1) = P( \min (X_2,X_3)> X_1)$. Since $\min (X_2,X_3)$ is exponential with parameter $\lambda_2+\lambda_3$, and is also independent of $X_1$, the result follows from the stated formula for the minimum of two independent exponential random variables.

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

For $t>0$ we have $$\{X_1\wedge X_2 > t\}=\{X_1>t\}\cap\{X_2>t\}, $$ so by independence, \begin{align} \mathbb P(X_1\wedge X_2 > t) &= \mathbb P(X_1 > t)\mathbb P(X_2>t)\\ &= e^{-\lambda_1 t}e^{-\lambda_2t}\\ &= e^{-(\lambda_1+\lambda_2)t}, \end{align} and hence $X_1\wedge X_2\sim\operatorname{Exp}(\lambda_1+\lambda_2)$. Now, given $n\geqslant1$, $$\bigwedge_{i=1}^{n+1} X_i = \left(\bigwedge_{i=1}^n X_i\right)\wedge X_{n+1}, $$ so by induction, $X_{n+1}\sim\operatorname{Exp}\left(\sum_{i=1}^{n+1} \lambda_i\right)$. The result follows from the fact that if $X\sim\operatorname{Exp}(\lambda)$, $Y\sim\operatorname{Exp}(\mu)$, then \begin{align} \mathbb P(X<Y) &= \int_0^\infty \mathbb P(X<Y\mid X=t)f_X(t)\ \mathsf dt\\ &= \int_0^\infty\mathbb P(Y>t)f_X(t)\ \mathsf dt\\ &= \int_0^\infty e^{-\mu t} \lambda e^{-\lambda t}\ \mathsf dt\\ &= \frac\lambda{\lambda+\mu}\int_0^\infty (\lambda+\mu)e^{-(\lambda+\mu) t} \mathsf dt\\ &= \frac\lambda{\lambda+\mu}. \end{align}

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.