5
$\begingroup$

Can anyone help point me to a solution method for this problem?

Solve $C(\vec{x})$, where $\vec{x}=(r,\theta,\phi)$ on $\Omega=\{\vec{x}\in\mathbb{R}^3\ |\ r\in[0,R],\ \phi\in[0,2\pi),\ \theta\in[0,\pi)\}$, where $R>0$. We define the boundaries and regions within $\Omega$ as follows: \begin{align} \partial\Omega_1 &= % \{\vec{x}\in\mathbb{R}^3\ |\ r=R,\ \theta\in[0,\theta_1),\ \phi\in[0,2\pi)\}\\ % \partial\Omega_2 &= % \{\vec{x}\in\mathbb{R}^3\ |\ r=R,\ \theta\in[\theta_1,\theta_2),\ \phi\in[0,2\pi)\}\\ % \partial\Omega_3 &= % \{\vec{x}\in\mathbb{R}^3\ |\ r=R,\ \theta\in[\theta_2,\pi),\ \phi\in[0,2\pi)\} \end{align} $C(\vec{x})$ is governed by the diffusion equation within $\Omega$ with boundary conditions given below, \begin{align} % 0 &= \nabla^2 C % \qquad &\text{for}\ \vec{x}\in\Omega \\ % -\vec{n}\cdot\nabla C &= -\mu % \qquad &\text{for}\ \vec{x}\in\partial\Omega_1\\ % -\vec{n}\cdot\nabla C &= \sigma C % \qquad &\text{for}\ \vec{x}\in\partial\Omega_2\\ % -\vec{n}\cdot\nabla C &= 0 % \qquad &\text{for}\ \vec{x}\in\partial\Omega_3 \end{align} where $\mu,\sigma>0$.

By symmetry the problem reduces to

\begin{align} 0 =& % \frac{\partial }{\partial r}\left( r^2 \frac{\partial C}{\partial r} \right) % + \frac{1}{\sin{\theta}} \frac{\partial}{\partial \theta} \left( \sin{\theta} \frac{\partial C}{\partial \theta} \right) \end{align}

With the same BC, however I can't find a solution method that does not cause the problem to become badly posed.

enter image description here

EDIT: I have come across this paper by Mottin, I am unsure of its applicability here due to the piecewise definition of our Robin boundary condition. Does this invalidate the result of this paper?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ what do you mean by "badly posed"? $\endgroup$ – Arashium Feb 28 '16 at 0:22
  • $\begingroup$ @Arashium: For example one of my attempts to segment the region and then match regions ended with the coefficients being over defined. $\endgroup$ – Freeman Feb 29 '16 at 17:34
2
+500
$\begingroup$

The paper [Mottin,2016] corresponds to the case where the boundaries are the pure Robin conditions (h is a constant). For your boundary conditions see the paragraph 8.3 of this paper and the references: [Alessandrini G. , Piero L. D. , Rondi L., Stable determination of corrosion by a single electrostatic boundary measurement, Inverse Probl. 2003; 19:973-984.] [Fasino D, Inglese G. An inverse Robin problem for Laplace’s equation: theoretical results and numerical methods. Inverse Probl. 1999;15:41–48].

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.