Let $SL(2,3)=SL(2,\mathbb{F}_3)$. Prove that there is no element of order $8$ in $SL(2,3)$.

My attempt:

Let $A$ be a matrix in $SL(2,3)$.

Then $A=U X U^{-1} $ for some invertible $U$ where $X$ is the diagonal matrix of eigenvalues of $A$. Then $A^n=UX^nU^{-1}$ and then we take the cases for different eigenvalues of $A$ but this does not seem to work as it implies every matrix in $SL(2,3)$ has order at most $2$.

Thanks in advance

  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Not all matrices is $SL(2,\Bbb F_3)$ can be diagonalised. For instance, this one cannot $$A=\begin{pmatrix}1&1\\0&1\end{pmatrix}$$ $\endgroup$ – user228113 Feb 21 '16 at 20:32
  • $\begingroup$ That explains why my attempt fails so badly, thank you. I struggle to see any other way to approach this problem though. $\endgroup$ – user316567 Feb 21 '16 at 20:34
  • 6
    $\begingroup$ Hint: $8$ is the order of a $2$-Sylow subgroup. Try to find a $2$-Sylow subgroup which is not cyclic. $\endgroup$ – Tobias Kildetoft Feb 21 '16 at 20:35
  • $\begingroup$ I had thought of this but was trying to find a way which avoided having to compute a sub-group. $\endgroup$ – user316567 Feb 21 '16 at 20:38
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @Pedro I am on my phone, so too much work to type up. Even better though: A cyclic $2$-Sylow would imply a normal $3$-Sylow, but the matrix $A$ above and its transpose generate distinct $3$-Sylow subgroups. $\endgroup$ – Tobias Kildetoft Feb 21 '16 at 22:01

Possibly the way that involves the least working with specific matrices and the most group theory:

Lemma1: The $p$-Sylow in $SL_n(\mathbb{F}_q)$ is not normal when $q$ is a power of $p$.
Proof: It is straightforward to check that either the set of upper- or lower triangular matrices with $1$'s on the diagonal is a $p$-Sylow, and since these are distinct, a $p$-Sylow is not normal.

Lemma2: If $|G| = 2^rm$ with $m$ odd and the $2$-Sylow is cyclic, then $G$ has a normal subgroup of order $m$.
Proof: Consider the action of $G$ on itself by left translation as a map to $S_{|G|}$ and not that a generator for a $2$-Sylow corresponds to $m$ disjoint $2^r$-cycles and is hence an odd permutations. This means that the image of $G$ is not contained in $A_{|G|}$ and thus the preimage of $A_{|G|}$ is a subgroup of $G$ of index $2$. Now the claim follows by induction on $r$ (since a normal subgroup of order $m$ is a Hall subgroup and thus characteristic).

Finally, we see that there is no element of order $8$ in $SL_2(\mathbb{F}_3)$ since this would mean it had a cyclic $2$-Sylow and by Lemma2 thus a normal subgroup of order $3$, i.e. a normal $3$-Sylow, which contradicts Lemma1.


Let $A$ be a matrix and $q(x)\in\Bbb F_3[x]$ its monic minimal polynomial. Since its characteristic polynomial $p(x)=\det(A-xI)$ has degree $2$, it holds $\deg q\le 2$. Notice that $p(x)$ is monic as well.

A matrix in $SL(2,\Bbb F_3)$ has order $8$ if and only if $q$ divides $x^8-1$, but it does not divide $x^4-1$.

Since the prime factorisation in $\Bbb F_3[x]$ of $x^8-1$ is \begin{align}x^8-1&=(x^4-1)(x^4+1)=\\&=\left[(x-1)(x+1)(x^2+1)\right]\left[(x^2+x-1)(x^2-x-1)\right]=\\\end{align} it must hold $q(x)=x^2-x-1$ or $q(x)=x^2+x-1$.

Since both $p(x)$ and $q(x)$ are monic, it must hold $p(x)=q(x)$. But then $q(0)=\det A=-1$, which contradicts the fact that $A\in SL(2,\Bbb F_3)$.


Well, if $A$ is not diagonalizable over $\bar{\mathbf F}_3$ then we may assume that $A=D+N$ with $$ D=\begin{pmatrix} \lambda&0\\0&\lambda\end{pmatrix} \quad\text{and}\quad N=\begin{pmatrix} 0&1\\0&0\end{pmatrix} $$ for some $\lambda\in\mathbf F_3^\star$. Since $D$ and $N$ commute, and since $N^2=0$, one has $$ A^8=D^8+8D^{7}N $$ whose element $(1,2)$ is nonzero.

If $A$ is diagonalizable over $\bar{\mathbf F}_3$ then we may assume that $$ A=\begin{pmatrix} \lambda&0\\0&\lambda^{-1}\end{pmatrix} $$ for some $\lambda\in \mathbf F_9^\star$. Of course, if $\lambda\in\mathbf F_3^\star$ then $A^2=I$. We may assume, therefore, that $\lambda\not\in\mathbf F_3$. But then $\lambda^{-1}$ should be the conjugate of $\lambda$ over $\mathbf F_3$, i.e., $\lambda^{-1}=\lambda^3$. It follows that $\lambda^4=1$ and $A^4=I$. Hence, $\mathrm{SL}(2,\mathbf F_3)$ does not contain any element of order $8$.


Note that $G={\rm SL}(2,3)$ has order $3\cdot 8$, so an element of order eight would afford a cyclic Sylow subgroup. Since all Sylow subgroups are conjugate (so in particular isomorphic), it suffices you produce a nonabelian subgroup in $G$ of order $8$.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.