Personal Note:
Good question, I remember wondering the same thing myself back when I new to real analysis. Here's a counter example:
Counter Example
\begin{equation}
d(x,y):=I_{\{(x,x)\}}(x,y):=\begin{cases}
1 &:\, \,x=y\\
0 &:\, \,x\neq y.
\end{cases}
\end{equation}
This is indeed a metric (check as an exercise).
Where $I_A$ is the indicator function of the set $A$; where here the set $(x,x)\in V\times V$.
If $r\in \mathbb{R}-\{0\}$, then $d(rx,ry)\in \{0,1\}$ hence $rd(x,y)\in \{0,r\}$ which is not in the range of $d:V\times V \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$.
So, the metric $d$ fails the property that any metric induced by a norm must have, ie:
\begin{equation}
\mbox{it fails to have the property that: } \|rx-ry\| =r\|x-y\|.
\end{equation}
Interpretation & Some Intuition:
The problem is that the topology is too fine, so all this topology can do is distinguish between things being the same or different.
As opposed to a norm topology which distinguised between object being, or not being on the same line (for some appropriate notion of line) (as well as them being different).
Hope this helps :)
\parallel
is a relation symbol, so it includes space on both sides. You want\lVert
and\rVert
for left and right delimiters, so that there is space on the "outside", but not on the "inside". $\endgroup$