Proving $\mathrm e <3$ Well I am just asking myself if there's a more elegant way of proving $$2<\exp(1)=\mathrm e<3$$ than doing it by induction and using the fact of  $\lim\limits_{n\rightarrow\infty}\left(1+\frac1n\right)^n=\mathrm e$, is there one (or some) alternative way(s)? 
 A: What answer you find most elegant may depend on what definition of $e$ you're starting with, as Dylan suggests, but I find this argument quite short and sweet:
$$\begin{align}
&\quad 1 + 1 &= 2\\
&< 1 + 1 + \frac12 + \frac1{2\cdot3} + \frac1{2\cdot3\cdot4} + \cdots &= e \\
&< 1 + 1 + \frac12 + \frac1{2\cdot2} + \frac1{2\cdot2\cdot2} + \cdots &= 3
\end{align}$$
A: You can use integration by parts to show: 
$$\int_1^e (\ln x)^2 dx = e-2$$
$$\int_1^e (\ln x )^3 dx = 6- 2e$$
Since $\ln(x)$ is strictly positive above $1$, we get 
$$e-2>0$$
$$6-2e>0$$
so that $2<e<3$. 
A: You can use 
$$e =\sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{1}{n!}= 2+\sum_{n=2}^\infty \frac{1}{n!}< 2+\sum_{n=2}^\infty \frac{1}{n(n-1)}=3 \,,$$
with the last equality following immediately from the fact that $\sum_{n=2}^\infty \frac{1}{n(n-1)}$ is telescopic.
Of course it depends on the way you define $e$, anyhow the equality
$$\sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{1}{n!}=\lim\limits_{n\rightarrow\infty}(1+\frac1n)^n$$
can be established easily using the binomial theorem.

Second solution
You can use the fact that $a_n=(1+\frac{1}{n})^{n+1}$ is decreasing. The inequality $a_{n+1} < a_n$ is an immediate consequence of Bernoulli Inequality.
Note that this implies (induction hidden here) that $a_n \leq a_6 <3$ for all $n \geq 3$, and that 
$$e =\lim a_n \leq a_6 <3 \,.$$ 

Here is one more:
$$e^{-1}=1-\frac{1}{1!}+\frac{1}{2!}-\frac{1}{3!}+.. \,.$$
Since the series is alternating and $\frac{1}{n!}$ is decreasing, it is obvious (very easy to show) that the series oscilates around the limit and
$$s_{2n+1}=1-\frac{1}{1!}+\frac{1}{2!}-\frac{1}{3!}+....+\frac{1}{(2n)!}-\frac{1}{(2n+1)!} \leq \frac{1}{e} \leq 1-\frac{1}{1!}+\frac{1}{2!}-\frac{1}{3!}+....+\frac{1}{(2n)!}=s_{2n}$$
[ Actually in the proof of the Alternating series test, one proves the stronger statement  that for such a series we have $s_{2n}$ decreasing, $s_{2n+1}$ increasing and $s_{2n+1} \leq s_{2n}$. ]
The inequality 
$$1-\frac{1}{1!}+\frac{1}{2!}-\frac{1}{3!} < \frac{1}{e} < 1-\frac{1}{1!}+\frac{1}{2!}$$ is
$$\frac{1}{3} < \frac{1}{e} < \frac{1}{2} \,.$$
A: It's equivalent to show that the natural logarithm of 3 is bigger than 1, but this is
$$
\int_1^3 \frac{dx}{x}.
$$
A right hand sum is guaranteed to underestimate this integral, so you just need to take a right hand sum with enough rectangles to get a value larger than 1.
A: First let's consider a simple heuristic argument to show that $2<e<4$.  It is easy to prove using the definition of the derivative that if $f(x)=2^x$ then $f'(x) = (\text{constant}\cdot 2^x$).  The curve gets steeper as $x$ increases, and the average slope between $x=0$ an $x=1$ is $(2^1-2^0)/(1-0)= 1$.  Therefore, the slope at $x=0$ is less than $1$; hence the "constant" is less than $1$.  Now do the same with $g(x)=4^x$ on the interval from $x=-1/2$ and $x=0$, and conclude that the slope at $x=0$ is more than $1$; hence the "constant" you get there is more than $1$.
So $2$ is too small, and $4$ is too big, to serve as the base of the natural exponential function.
It's messier to do the same with $3$, but the interval from $x=-1/6$ to $x=0$ will do it, and you conclude $3$ is too big to be the base of the natural exponential function.
A: The sequence $x_n=(1+1/n)^{n+1}$ is strictly decreasing and converges to $e.$ So $e<x_5=2.985984 <3.$ 
Remark: $\ln x_n=-(n+1)\ln (1-1/(n+1))=1+\sum_{j=1}^{\infty}(j+1)^{-1}(n+1)^{-j}.$ Comparing the terms of this series to the corresponding terms  in the series for $\ln x_{n+1} , $ we see that $\ln x_n>\ln x_{n+1} , $ so $ x_n>x_{n+1}.$ 
A: Observe that, $(1 + \frac 1 n)^n = 1 + 1 + (1 - \frac 1 n)/2! + (1 - \frac 1 n)(1 - \frac 2 n)/3! + ... + (1 - \frac 1 n)(1 - \frac 2 n)...(1 - (n-1)/n)/n! < 1 + 1 + 1/2! + ... + 1/n! < 1 + 1 + 1/2 + 1/2^2 + ... + 1/2^{n-1}$, [since $n! > 2^{n-1}, \forall_n \geq 3$].
So, $(1 + \frac 1 n)^n < 3 - (\frac 1 2)^n$.Now as $n$ is tending to infinity $(\frac 1 2)^n$ diminishes indefinitely and ultimately we obtain $e < 3$.
