I have question about comment in Lee's Introduction to Smooth Manifolds - page 51.

Given smooth map $F:M\to N$ between smooth manifolds $M$ and $N$ we say that the total derivative of $F$ at $p\in M$ (given chart $(U,\varphi)$ around $p$ and $(V,\psi)$ around $F(p)$) is given by $D(\psi\circ F\circ \varphi^{-1})(\varphi(p))$. The comment in the book is that total derivative is chart independent. If there is another chart $(U',\varphi')$ around $p$ then we should have

$$D(\psi\circ F\circ\varphi'^{-1})(\varphi'(p))=D(\psi\circ F\circ \varphi^{-1}\circ \varphi \circ \varphi'^{-1})(\varphi'(p))=$$ $$D(\psi\circ F\circ\varphi^{-1})(\varphi(p))\cdot D(\varphi \circ\varphi'^{-1})(\varphi (p)).$$

If total derivative is chart independent we should have $D(\varphi\circ \varphi'^{-1})(\varphi'(p))=\mathbb{Id}$, which doesn't have to be the case.

Whats wrong in my reasoning?


"Chart independent" does not mean what you think it means.

A smooth vector field $v$ on a manifold $M$ is chart independent: treating it as a derivation on smooth functions, $v(f)$ is a scalar independent of which vector field in which you compute it. But the expression of the vector field $v$ in a coordinate basis $v = \sum v^i \partial_i$ is clearly dependent on the choice of charts. In fact, any nontrivial element $k\in T_pM$, when written in a coordinate basis, will depend on the choice of charts. This is simply the fact that different coordinate charts give rise to possibly different coordinate bases of $T_pM$, and the only element $k$ in a vector space whose coordinate representation is the same in all bases is the 0 element.

In other words, "chart independent" should be taken to mean that the object is naturally co/contravariant under changes of bases in (co)tangent spaces, or equivalently changes of charts.

As you can easily verify: if $k\in T_pM$, then $DF(k) \in T_{F(p)}N$ is independent of choice of charts, since the change of representations of $k$ as a vector under the chart $(U,\varphi)$ and under the chart $(U',\varphi')$ precisely cancels the factor $D(\varphi\circ\varphi'^{-1})$ you get.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.