1
$\begingroup$

I seek a separable solution to the nonlinear parabolic partial differential equation,

$\frac{\partial u}{\partial t} = u \frac{\partial u}{\partial x^2} + u^2.$

The physics of the problem allow either homogeneous Neumann or homogeneous Dirichlet boundary conditions at prescribed points, say at $x=\pm1$. The initial condition is a prescribed function $u(x,t=0) = f(x)$.

Assuming a form $u(x,t) = f(x)g(t)$ results in

$\frac{g^{\prime}}{g^2} = f^{\prime\prime} + f = \lambda,$

for seperation constant $\lambda$.

The PDE therefore reduces to two ODEs. Their solutions are

$g(t) = \frac{1}{c_0 - \lambda t}$ and $f(x) = c_1\sin x + c_2 \cos x + \lambda.$

I am not sure what to do next. The solutions for the functions $f(x)$ and $g(t)$ don't have the same form as the typical eigenfunction expansions that arise, for example, with linear heat and wave equations. Is there are fundamental idea that I am missing? How do I enforce (either type of) boundary conditions and the initial condition?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Are you quoting the PDE correctly? Where are you getting that second derivative with respect to $x$? There's no derivative with respect to $x$ at all in the equation you gave. $\endgroup$ – Robert Israel Feb 12 '16 at 1:48
  • $\begingroup$ Sorry about that. There was a typo but it's fixed now. $\endgroup$ – DieLuftDerFreiheit Feb 12 '16 at 1:53
  • $\begingroup$ Out of curiosity: how does this equation arise, i.e. what is the underlying physical problem? $\endgroup$ – Frits Veerman Feb 15 '16 at 18:02
  • $\begingroup$ The problem arises from the study of the frictional sliding of thin film on a rigid substrate. The terms have more physical meaning when written as $\dot u/u - u = u''$. $u$ is the sliding velocity. The two terms on the left represent two different frictional processes and the term on the right represents a flexure-type elastic operator. $\endgroup$ – DieLuftDerFreiheit Feb 16 '16 at 18:54
3
$\begingroup$

For nonlinear equations, you can't do "eigenfunction expansions" because there is no superposition principle: a linear combination of solutions is not likely to be a solution. So you can't build up a solution from simpler solutions. About the only hope, unless you can somehow transform the problem to a linear one, is that you can solve the whole problem in one fell swoop.

EDIT: Well, one thing you can try is a series solution in powers of $t$.
Let $u(x,t) = \sum_{n=0}^\infty u_n(x) t^n$, where $u_0(x) = u(x,0) = f(x)$. Substituting this into your PDE and expanding in powers of $t$, the coefficient of $t^n$ will give you an equation for $u_{n+1}$ in terms of the previous $u_j$ and their derivatives.

$$ \eqalign{ u_1(x) &= u_0(x) u_0''(x) + u_0(x)^2\cr 2 u_2(x) &= u_0(x) u_1''(x) + u_1(x) u_0''(x) + 2 u_0(x) u_1(x)\cr 3 u_3(x) &= u_0(x) u_2''(x) + u_1(x) u_1''(x) + u_2(x) u_0''(x) + 2 u_0(x) u_2(x) + u_1(x)^2\cr etc &\cr}$$

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.