-1
$\begingroup$

Noam Elkies explained why $\pi^2=9.8696...$ is so close to $10$ using an inequality on Euler's solution to Basel problem

$$\frac{\pi^2}{6}=\sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \frac{1}{\left(k+1\right)^2}$$

to form a telescoping series. As a better approximation, taking one more term of this series, $$\pi^2\approx 9.9$$ was obtained.

http://www.math.harvard.edu/~elkies/Misc/pi10.pdf

There is a simple series for $\pi$ whose first term is $3$, so it may be regarded as an explanation why $\pi$ is close to $3$ and a proof that $\pi>3$, because all the remaining terms are positive as well.

$$ \begin{align} \pi &= 3\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}\frac{1}{(4k+1)(2k+1)(k+1)} \\ &= 3+3\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{(4k+1)(2k+1)(k+1)} \end{align} $$ Q: Is there a similar way to show that $\pi^2$ is close to $10$ and have an approximation closer than $9.9$?

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Actually, it's not that close... $\endgroup$ – Surb Feb 8 '16 at 18:31
  • $\begingroup$ @Surb: Or "what's the distance from $\pi^2$ to $10$?" The answer would be the same. $\endgroup$ – Jaume Oliver Lafont Feb 8 '16 at 18:39
  • $\begingroup$ Why do you even mention Noam Elkies' web page, since you don't intend to use anything from it to improve your approximation? $\endgroup$ – David K Feb 8 '16 at 19:05
  • $\begingroup$ @DavidK It is the same problem, it is the paper that motivated me to try a different solution and there are also telescoping series in the proof of the series I wrote without a proof. Maybe I should add that proof. $\endgroup$ – Jaume Oliver Lafont Feb 8 '16 at 21:48
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I didn't realize you were citing that paper as inspiration rather than as a possible source of facts to use. As a source of inspiration to try your own approach, that's fine. $\endgroup$ – David K Feb 8 '16 at 22:06
3
$\begingroup$

Truncating the following series by Ramanujan that converges to $\pi^2$ from above, $$\pi^2=10-\sum_{k=0}^\infty\frac{1}{((k+1)(k+2))^3}=10-\frac{1}{8}-\frac{1}{216}-\frac{1}{1728}-\frac{1}{8000}-\frac{1}{27000}-...$$ yields $$\pi^2<10-\frac{1}{8}=\frac{79}{8}=9.875$$

Both $10$ and $\frac{79}{8}$ are convergents from the continued fraction for $\pi^2$.

From below, $$\pi^2=\frac{39}{4}+\sum_{k=0}^\infty\frac{4}{((k+1)(k+2)(k+3))^2}=\frac{39}{4}+\frac{1}{9}+\frac{1}{144}+\frac{1}{900}+\frac{1}{3600}+\frac{1}{11025}+...$$

taking the first term only gives $$\pi^2>\frac{39}{4}+\frac{1}{9}=\frac{355}{36}=9.861...$$

Finally, $$10-\frac{1}{4}<\frac{355}{36}<\pi^2<\frac{79}{8}<10$$

[EDIT] These series have a sixth order polynomial in the denominator. The same approximations $\dfrac{39}{4}$ and $10$ are related to simpler series using fourth order polynomials.

$$\begin{align} \pi^2 &= 9 + \sum_{k=0}^\infty \frac{3}{(k + 1)^2 (k + 2)^2}\\ &=\frac{39}{4} + \sum_{k=1}^\infty \frac{3}{(k + 1)^2 (k + 2)^2}\\ \\ \pi^2 &= \frac{21}{2} - \sum_{k=0}^\infty \frac{6}{(k + 1) (k + 2)^2 (k+3)}\\ &=10 -\sum_{k=1}^\infty \frac{6}{(k + 1) (k + 2)^2 (k+3)}\\ \end{align}$$

$\endgroup$
  • 6
    $\begingroup$ Why are you asking and answering your own question immediately? $\endgroup$ – BigbearZzz Feb 7 '16 at 6:55
  • 16
    $\begingroup$ Maybe he forgot to sign out before answering on another account. $\endgroup$ – Decaf-Math Feb 7 '16 at 6:56
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ Maybe he want to earn the "Self-Learner" badge? xd $\endgroup$ – Mythomorphic Feb 7 '16 at 7:15
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @BigbearZzz Related (and showing your puzzlement is legitimate). $\endgroup$ – Did Feb 7 '16 at 7:54
  • $\begingroup$ @BigbearZzz I had an answer for a question I did not find, so I added both myself. $\endgroup$ – Jaume Oliver Lafont Feb 8 '16 at 22:23
1
$\begingroup$

There is really no incredibly complex reason for this. It is called a mathematical coincidence. Your question is like asking:

"Why is $e^\pi -\pi\approx20$?"

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

An integral proof that $10>\pi^2$ is given by

$$\int_0^1 \frac{24 x^2 (1 - x)^2 (49 - 100 x (1 - x)^2) \log(\frac{1}{x})}{151 (1 + x^2)} dx = 10 - \pi^2$$

WolframAlpha link

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.