0
$\begingroup$

Given $f$ increasing on $[a,b]$, $g(x)\in R(\alpha)$ on $[a,b]$, $\alpha \in C([a,b])$ and $\alpha \in BV([a,b])$ $$ \beta(x)=\int_a^xg(z)d\alpha(z) \text{ on [a,b]} $$

Why is the additional assumption $f$ continuous and what theorem if any is needed to show the we can substitute $d\beta$ in the following? $$ \int_a^bfd\beta= \int_a^bfgd\alpha $$

I thought that by the definition of $\beta$ it is differentiable and continuous on $[a,b]$ and I just did a direct substitution $d\beta=g(x)d\alpha(x)$. With an unused assumption I am concerned I overlooked something.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ It says f is increasing! $\endgroup$ – Mhenni Benghorbal Feb 7 '16 at 5:12
  • $\begingroup$ thanks, but why do we care about that and $f$ continuous when working with $d\beta$? $\endgroup$ – StackAbstraction Feb 7 '16 at 13:48
  • $\begingroup$ I've already shown that $f \in BV([a,b])$ and $\beta$ continuous so $f \in R(\beta)$. $\endgroup$ – StackAbstraction Feb 7 '16 at 13:55
1
$\begingroup$

In general, for any increasing $\beta$ on $[a,b]$, $$ \beta(b) - \beta(a) \geq \int_a^b \beta'(t) dt $$ $\beta'$ exists a.e. since $\beta$ is increasing, so $\beta'$ is Riemann integrable. The above turns into equality when $\beta$ is absolutely continuous.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Why do we care about $f$ when we are working with $d\beta$? This does not address $f$ is continuous. We know by definition of $\beta$ that it is differentiable and continuous right? $\endgroup$ – StackAbstraction Feb 7 '16 at 13:46
  • $\begingroup$ @stackabstraction By $f$ I meant $\beta$ $\endgroup$ – Henricus V. Feb 7 '16 at 14:30

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.