I wanted to compute the radius of convergence for the following the power series

$$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} a_nz^n$$

with $(i) \, a_n = n!, \, (ii) \, a_n = \sqrt[\leftroot{-3}\uproot{3}n]{n}$

Then I need to determine which power series defines a function that is twice differentiable and compute the second derivative.

For the convergence radius I had no problem, and used once the Alembert criterion, once the Cauchy criterion and found that the convergence radius for $a_n = n!$ is 0, and the one for $a_n = 1$.

Now I'm tempted to say that therefore the first power series gives a non differentiable function, since it doesn't converge. Is that right? Because I'm not sure about it.

Then for the second I was told that since the convergence radius is $1$, it's differentiable at $]-1,1[$, which I can understand, but that it's also automatically differentiable twice at $]-1,1[$. And that part I don't undertand. Why? Has that something to do with the radius being specifically $1$? And how to conclude in general?

For the last question, about derivating twice, isn't it just derivate the sum? So I'd get:

$$f''(x) = \sum_{n = 2}^{\infty} n(n-1)a_nz^{n-2}$$


Every convergent power series is infinitely differentiable in the same interval of convergence. $$ f'(x)=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}na_nx^{n-1} $$ So radius of convergence of $f'(x)$ is $$ {1\over\limsup(n|a_n|)^{1\over n}}={1\over\limsup |a_n|^{1\over n}} $$ as $$\lim_{n\to\infty}n^{1\over n}=1$$

  • $\begingroup$ Ok, so "at least twice differentiable" meant exactly that. Is there a way that the power series is exactly once differentiable? $\endgroup$ – K.A. Jan 28 '16 at 22:48
  • $\begingroup$ nope ........:) $\endgroup$ – Jack's wasted life Jan 28 '16 at 22:50
  • $\begingroup$ Ok. Then it was a weird question. Thank you anyway :). $\endgroup$ – K.A. Jan 28 '16 at 22:55

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.