6
$\begingroup$

Find a number $n$ which has

  • $12$ divisors $(1 = d_1 < d_2 < \cdots <d_{12}=n )$ and
  • $d_{d_4-1}=(d_1+d_2+d_4)d_8$.

Note: This is a problem from Russian Mathematical Olympiad 1989.
I think this is related with this one. But this seems harder to me.

$\endgroup$
3
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ A first obsevation is that $d_4$ is either $10, 11$ or $13$ ($9$ or less implies $d_8 < d_8$ or something similar, greater than $13$ gives an undefined index, and if $d_4 = 12$, then we have $1, 2, 3, 4, 6$ as divisors as well, which means $d_4$ isn't the fourth one). $\endgroup$
    – Arthur
    Jan 25, 2016 at 12:32
  • $\begingroup$ @Arthur But this problem has a unique solution. $\endgroup$ Jan 25, 2016 at 15:28
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I have never said that there was more than one solution. All I am saying is that just from looking at the indices in condition 2, you can rule out a whole lot of potential $d_4$'s. $\endgroup$
    – Arthur
    Jan 25, 2016 at 17:05

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

A shorter solution than my original posted here:

As you can see, $d_1+d_2+d_4>d_4$. By other side, as $d_1+d_2+d_4$ divides a divisor of $n$, implies that $d_1+d_2+d_4=d_i$ for $4<i<12$. Note that

$$d_1+d_2+d_4=\frac{d_{d_4-1}}{d_8} \leq \frac{n}{d_8}=d_5$$

So, as $d_4< d_1+d_2+d_4 \leq d_5$, implies the equality $d_1+d_2+d_4=d_5$.

So $d_{d_4-1}=n$, that means that $d_4-1=12$, so $d_4=13$.

Now, as the number has 12 divisors, it must be of the form $p^{11}$, $p^5q$, $p^3q^2$ $p^2qr$.

  • If $n=p^{11}$, $p=13$, but $d_4=13$, so $d_1=d_4$. Contradiction

  • If $n=p^5q$ or $n=p^3q^2$, $p$ or $q$ must be 13 since $d_4=13$, so the other must be 2, or if not, $d_1+d_2+d_4$ will be even, and $n$ will have three prime divisors and that doesn't happen for this case. But, if the other prime is 2, the only valid sum able for $d_1+d_2+d_4$ can be $1+2+13=16$, and 16 divides $n$ only in the case where $n=p^5q$, with $p=2$, but if that happens, $d_4=8$, and makes a contradiction.

So the only valid case is $n=p^2qr$, with $d_2,d_3<13$. Again, 2 doesn't divide $n$ since $d_1+d_2+d_4$ will be equal to 16, and $p^4$ doesn't divide $n$ for any prime $p$.

For $d_3\neq d_2^2$, we have that $d_2=3,5,7$, that implies that

$$d_1+d_2+d_4= 1+3+13, 1+5+13, 1+7+13= 17,19,21$$

In the first two cases $n$ doesn't have possible values for $d_3$, and in the last one, 3 divides $n$, making $d_2=3=7=d_2$, contradiction.

So the only way is making $d_2=3,d_3=d_2^2=9$, and this lets me $d_1+d_2+d_4=1+3+13=17$, so $n=9*13*17=1989$, and is clear that $17*117=1989$

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .