1
$\begingroup$

I am still puzzeling to get a nice equation for the arclength of an hypercycle.

(I asked a similar question (less developed) about a year ago that was never answered, now i am a bit further, i deleted the old question, to prevent duplicates)

Given:

  • a standard hyperbolic plane (curvature = -1)

  • two points $S_1$ and $S_2$ a distance $s$ apart.

What is the arclength of the hypercycle $h$ whose axis is a distance $d$ away as function of $s$ and $d$?

How far I came:

  • make the Saccheri Quadrilateral whose summit $S_1S_2$ and whose base is $B_1B_2$ (so the angles $\angle S_1B_1B_2$ and $\angle B_1B_2S_2$ are right base angles) and call the distance $B_1B_2 \ b $.

Then the following equations are valid:

$$ h = b \cosh(d) $$

$$ \sinh \left( \frac {s}{2} \right) = \sinh \left( \frac{b}{2} \right) \cosh(d) $$

But then to remove $b$ out of the equation I get stuck on the rather complicated formula:

$$ h = 2 \operatorname{arsinh} \left( \frac{ \sinh \left( \frac{s}{2} \right) }{\cosh (d)} \right) \cosh (d) $$

and

$$ s = 2 \operatorname{arsinh} \left( \sinh \left( \frac{h}{2 \cosh (d)} \right) \cosh (d) \right) \cosh (d) $$

Can these formulas be simplified further?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Originally you wanted $h$ in terms of $s,d.$ Then eliminating $b$ you get to the first additional formula, as in my answer. But your second added formula makes it look like you're going for $s$ in terms of $h,d.$ Which variable do you want in terms of the other two? $\endgroup$ – coffeemath Jan 28 '16 at 16:37
  • $\begingroup$ Yes i am looking for $h$ as function of $s$ and $d$ , just added $s$ as function of $h$ and $d$ for completeness. $\endgroup$ – Willemien Jan 28 '16 at 16:42
1
$\begingroup$

$\sinh(x)$ being strictly increasing on the reals, has a unique inverse function. Specific values for the inverse can be found using the definition of $\sinh(x)$ and the quadratic equation, and a logarithm extraction.

You already have $\sinh(b/2)=\sinh(s/2)/\cosh(d)$ in terms of $s,d.$ So after applying inverse sinh and doubling you have $b$ in terms of $s,d,$ which may be then put into $h=b\cosh(d)$ to arrive at $h$ in terms of $s,d.$

Added later: The inverse sinh in terms of log is $$\sinh^{-1}(x)=\log(x+\sqrt{x^2+1}).$$ When used here, it produces a rather involved expression for $h$ in terms of $s,d$ which (as far as I see) doesn't simplify to anything "nice", due to the expression inside the log at the end.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ thanks I changed the question a bit, hope you can help me further $\endgroup$ – Willemien Jan 28 '16 at 12:33
  • $\begingroup$ Since the inverse sinh is in terms of log as noted, I think your formula cannot simplify because of the expression $\sinh(s/2)/(\cosh(d)$ which ends up inside the logarithm, and it cannot be pulled out using log rules. $\endgroup$ – coffeemath Jan 29 '16 at 13:13

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.