4
$\begingroup$

We have two random variables $X$ and $Y$ which are log normally distributed, with suitable parameters, what is the expected value for $\max(X,Y)$?

Given,

$$ X=e^{\mu+\sigma Z_{1}};\quad Y=e^{\nu+\tau Z_{2}};\quad Z_{1}\sim N(0,1);Z_{2}\sim N(0,1); $$

$Z_{1}, Z_{2}$ can be assumed independent if it simplifies matters.

We need to find an expression for $$E[\text{max}(X,Y)]$$

Please note I have reached the step below, but am unsure how to proceed further.

Steps Tried

\begin{eqnarray*} E\left[\max\left(X,Y\right)\right]=\int_{0}^{\infty}xf_{Y}\left(x\right)F_{X}\left(x\right)dx+\int_{0}^{\infty}yf_{X}\left(y\right)F_{Y}\left(y\right)dy \end{eqnarray*} \begin{eqnarray*} \int_{0}^{\infty}xf_{Y}\left(x\right)F_{X}\left(x\right)dx{\displaystyle =\int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{1}{\tau}\phi\left(\frac{\ln x-\nu}{\tau}\right)}\Phi\left(\frac{\ln x-\mu}{\sigma}\right)dx \end{eqnarray*} \begin{eqnarray*} {\displaystyle =\int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{1}{\tau}\phi\left(\frac{\ln x-\nu}{\tau}\right)}\Phi\left(\frac{\ln x-\mu}{\sigma}\right)dx\quad\text{, Substitution }u=\left(\frac{\ln x-\nu}{\tau}\right)\Rightarrow du=\frac{1}{x\tau}dx \end{eqnarray*} \begin{eqnarray*} {\displaystyle =\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}e^{u\tau+\nu}\phi\left(u\right)}\Phi\left(\frac{u\tau+\nu-\mu}{\sigma}\right)du \end{eqnarray*} \begin{eqnarray*} {\displaystyle =e^{\nu}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}e^{u\tau}\phi\left(u\right)}\Phi\left(\frac{u\tau+\nu-\mu}{\sigma}\right)du \end{eqnarray*}

Related Question

Please note, an earlier question considers the case where there is only one source of randomness. This earlier question was mis-phrased due to my limited knowledge; but still provides an interesting and instructive solution.

Expected Value of Maximum of Two Lognormal Random Variables with One Source of Randomness

Please let me know of any other suggestions …

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Hint: $\max{a,b}=\max\{\log(a),\log(b)\}$ if $a,b>0$ $\endgroup$ – sinbadh Jan 16 '16 at 4:09
  • $\begingroup$ Your first identity has some issues: it appear that the indicator functions for $X>Y$ and $X\le Y$ are not considered. $\endgroup$ – Gordon Jan 19 '16 at 18:08
3
$\begingroup$

WLOG, we assume that $\sigma>0$ and $\tau >0$. Then \begin{align} E(\max(X, Y)) &= \iint\limits_{\mu+\sigma z_1 \ge \nu + \tau z_2}e^{\mu+\sigma z_1}\frac{1}{2\pi}e^{-\frac{1}{2}(z_1^2+z_2^2)}dz_1 dz_2 \\ &\quad + \iint\limits_{\mu+\sigma z_1 \le \nu + \tau z_2}e^{\nu+\tau z_2}\frac{1}{2\pi}e^{-\frac{1}{2}(z_1^2+z_2^2)}dz_1 dz_2. \end{align} Making the substitutions \begin{align*} x = \frac{\sigma z_1 - \tau z_2}{\sqrt{\sigma^2+\tau^2}} \mbox{ and } y = \frac{\tau z_1 + \sigma z_2}{\sqrt{\sigma^2+\tau^2}}, \end{align*} we obtain that \begin{align*} & \ \iint\limits_{\mu+\sigma z_1 \ge \nu + \tau z_2}e^{\mu+\sigma z_1}\frac{1}{2\pi}e^{-\frac{1}{2}(z_1^2+z_2^2)}dz_1 dz_2\\ =&\ \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dy \int_{\frac{\nu-\mu}{\sqrt{\sigma^2+\tau^2}}}^{\infty}e^{\mu+\sigma \frac{\sigma x + \tau y}{\sqrt{\sigma^2+\tau^2}}}\frac{1}{2\pi}e^{-\frac{1}{2}(x^2+y^2)}dxdy\\ =&\ \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dy \int_{\frac{\nu-\mu}{\sqrt{\sigma^2+\tau^2}}}^{\infty}e^{\mu+\frac{1}{2}\sigma^2}\frac{1}{2\pi}e^{-\frac{1}{2}\left[\big(x-\frac{\sigma^2}{\sqrt{\sigma^2+\tau^2}}\big)^2+\big(y-\frac{\sigma\tau}{\sqrt{\sigma^2+\tau^2}}\big)^2\right]}dxdy\\ =&\ \int_{\frac{\nu-\mu}{\sqrt{\sigma^2+\tau^2}}}^{\infty}e^{\mu+\frac{1}{2}\sigma^2}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}e^{-\frac{1}{2}\big(x-\frac{\sigma^2}{\sqrt{\sigma^2+\tau^2}}\big)^2}dx\\ =&\ \int_{-\infty}^{-\frac{\nu-\mu}{\sqrt{\sigma^2+\tau^2}}}e^{\mu+\frac{1}{2}\sigma^2}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}e^{-\frac{1}{2}\big(x+\frac{\sigma^2}{\sqrt{\sigma^2+\tau^2}}\big)^2}dx\\ =&\ e^{\mu+\frac{1}{2}\sigma^2} N\left(\frac{-\nu+\mu+\sigma^2}{\sqrt{\sigma^2+\tau^2}} \right), \end{align*} where $N$ is the cumulative distribution function of a standard normal random variable. Similarly, \begin{align*} \iint\limits_{\nu + \tau z_2 \ge \mu+\sigma z_1}e^{\nu+\tau z_2}\frac{1}{2\pi}e^{-\frac{1}{2}(z_1^2+z_2^2)}dz_1 dz_2 &= e^{\nu+\frac{1}{2}\tau^2} N\left(\frac{-\mu+\nu+\tau^2}{\sqrt{\sigma^2+\tau^2}} \right). \end{align*} That is, \begin{align*} E(\max(X, Y)) &= e^{\nu+\frac{1}{2}\tau^2} N\left(\frac{-\mu+\nu+\tau^2}{\sqrt{\sigma^2+\tau^2}} \right) + e^{\mu+\frac{1}{2}\sigma^2} N\left(\frac{-\nu+\mu+\sigma^2}{\sqrt{\sigma^2+\tau^2}} \right). \end{align*}

Alternative solution.

Note that \begin{align*} \max(X, Y) &= Y + \max(X-Y, \ 0)\\ &= Y + Y\max\Big(\frac{X}{Y}-1, \ 0\Big). \end{align*} Let $P$ be the given probability measure, and $Q$ be a probability measure that is defined by the Randon-Nykodim derivative \begin{align*} \frac{dQ}{dP} = e^{-\frac{1}{2}\tau^2 + \tau Z_2}. \end{align*} Then \begin{align*} \widehat{Z}_1 = Z_1, \mbox{ and } \widehat{Z}_2 = Z_2 - \tau \end{align*} are two standard independent normal random variables under the probability measure $Q$. Moreover, \begin{align*} Z \equiv \frac{X}{Y} &= e^{\mu-\nu - \tau^2 + \sigma \widehat{Z}_1 - \tau \widehat{Z}_2}\\ &= e^{\mu-\nu - \tau^2 + \sqrt{\sigma^2+\tau^2} \xi}, \end{align*} where \begin{align*} \xi = \frac{\sigma \widehat{Z}_1 - \tau \widehat{Z}_2}{\sqrt{\sigma^2+\tau^2}} \end{align*} is a standard normal random variable. Let \begin{align*} \lambda = \frac{-\mu+ \nu + \tau^2}{\sqrt{\sigma^2+\tau^2}}, \end{align*} and $E_Q$ be the expectation operator under the measure $Q$. Then, \begin{align*} E\big(\max(X, Y) \big) &= E(Y)+E\big(Y\max(Z-1, \ 0) \big)\\ &=E(Y)+e^{\nu+\frac{1}{2}\tau^2} E_Q\big(\max(Z-1, \ 0) \big). \end{align*} Furthermore, \begin{align*} E_Q\big(\max(Z-1, \ 0) \big) &= E_Q\left(Z\,\mathbb{I}_{Z \ge 1}\right) - E_Q\left(\mathbb{I}_{Z \ge 1}\right)\\ &=\int_{\lambda}^{\infty} \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}e^{\mu-\nu -\tau^2 + \sqrt{\sigma^2+\tau^2} z -\frac{1}{2}z^2} dz - N(-\lambda)\\ &=e^{\mu-\nu + \frac{1}{2} (\sigma^2-\tau^2)} \int_{\lambda}^{\infty} \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}e^{-\frac{1}{2}\big(z-\sqrt{\sigma^2+\tau^2}\big)^2} dz - N(-\lambda)\\ &=e^{\mu-\nu + \frac{1}{2} (\sigma^2-\tau^2)}N\Big(\sqrt{\sigma^2+\tau^2} -\lambda\Big) - N(-\lambda). \end{align*} That is, \begin{align*} E\big(\max(X, Y) \big) &= e^{\nu + \frac{1}{2}\tau^2} \bigg[1 + e^{\mu-\nu + \frac{1}{2} (\sigma^2-\tau^2)}N\Big(\sqrt{\sigma^2+\tau^2} -\lambda\Big) - N(-\lambda) \bigg]\\ &=e^{\nu + \frac{1}{2}\tau^2} N(\lambda) + e^{\mu + \frac{1}{2} \sigma^2}N\Big(\sqrt{\sigma^2+\tau^2} -\lambda\Big)\\ &= e^{\nu + \frac{1}{2}\tau^2}N\left(\frac{-\mu+ \nu + \tau^2}{\sqrt{\sigma^2+\tau^2}}\right) + e^{\mu + \frac{1}{2} \sigma^2}N\left(\frac{-\nu+\mu+\sigma^2}{\sqrt{\sigma^2+\tau^2}} \right). \end{align*}

Comments. You can make this question more general by assuming that \begin{align*} X=e^{\mu+\sigma Z_1} \quad \mbox{and} \quad Y = e^{\nu+\tau\big(\rho Z_1 + \sqrt{1-\rho^2} Z_2\big)}, \end{align*} where $Z_1$ and $Z_2$ are two independent standard normal random variables, and $|\rho|<1$. In this case, the measure $Q$ can be defined by \begin{align*} \frac{dQ}{dP} = e^{-\frac{1}{2}\tau^2 + \tau \big(\rho Z_1 + \sqrt{1-\rho^2} Z_2\big)}. \end{align*} Moreover, \begin{align*} \widehat{Z}_1 = Z_1 - \rho\tau, \mbox{ and } \widehat{Z}_2 = Z_2 - \sqrt{1-\rho^2}\tau \end{align*} are two standard independent normal random variables under the probability measure $Q$. See also this question at https://quant.stackexchange.com/questions/21361/how-to-use-a-change-of-numeraire-to-price-this-option/21375#21375.

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Super. But shouldn't: $$\begin{align*} E(\max(X, Y)) &= e^{\nu+\frac{1}{2}\tau^2} N\left(-\frac{-\mu+\nu+\tau^2}{\sqrt{\sigma^2+\tau^2}} \right) + e^{\mu+\frac{1}{2}\sigma^2} N\left(\frac{-\nu+\mu+\sigma^2}{\sqrt{\sigma^2+\tau^2}} \right). \end{align*}$$ be $$\begin{align*} E(\max(X, Y)) &= e^{\nu+\frac{1}{2}\tau^2} N\left(\frac{-\mu+\nu+\tau^2}{\sqrt{\sigma^2+\tau^2}} \right) + e^{\mu+\frac{1}{2}\sigma^2} N\left(\frac{-\nu+\mu+\sigma^2}{\sqrt{\sigma^2+\tau^2}} \right). \end{align*}$$ ... can you check the minus sign ... $\endgroup$ – wolfies Jan 19 '16 at 14:43
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks @wolfies. I made the corrections. $\endgroup$ – Gordon Jan 19 '16 at 15:29
  • $\begingroup$ @Gordon Thanks for this detailed, clear and wonderful answer. One possibly trivial question regarding the, "WLOG, we assume that $\sigma >0$ and $\tau>0$" Are there cases where these two can be negative? Is there some sort of space where variances can be negative or some such advanced concept? $\endgroup$ – texmex Jan 20 '16 at 13:00
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @user249613: If $\sigma<0$, then we write $X$ as $X=e^{\mu +(-\sigma)(-Z_1)}$, where $-Z_1$ is also a standard normal random variable. The variance is always positive. However, as it is not specified that $\sigma$ is a standard deviation here, it is possible to have $\sigma <0$. $\endgroup$ – Gordon Jan 20 '16 at 13:44

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.