Stromquist's Theorem: If the simple closed curve J is "nice enough" then it has an inscribed square.
"Nice enough" includes polygons.
Read more about it here: www.webpages.uidaho.edu/~markn/squares
An "inscribed square" means that the corners of a square overlap with the curve.

I would like to suggest a counter-example:

The curve connected by the points$$ (0.2,0),\ (1,0),\ (1,1),\ (0,1),\ (0,0.2),\ (-0.2, -0.2),\ (0.2,0).$$ Link to plot: http://www.freeimagehosting.net/uploads/5b289e6824.png
Can this curve be incribed by a square?

(An older version of this question had another example: a triangle on top of a square (without their mutual side.) )


Regarding your edit: (0.2, 0) — (1, 0.2) — (0.8, 1) — (0, 0.8) (and many others)



What about the square on the bottom- with it and the triangle's mutual side returned?

Edit: Btw. Don't be disheartened that your counterexample didn't come through- looking for counterexamples to proved theorems will never give a genuine counterexample (unless ZFC turns out to be inconsistent!!;)), but it can provide valuable insight into what the theorem means.

Here you can see from experience that 'most of the square' may be contained within the curve- this is something that may not be obvious looking at the examples of Stormquist in action in books on the topic.

Trying to find counterexamples, IMHO, is a great way to develop as a mathematician- just do not be afraid to be wrong ;)

  • $\begingroup$ I revised the example. Can you tell what is wrong with the newer one? $\endgroup$ – metame Aug 5 '10 at 13:50

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.