0
$\begingroup$

Wikipedia says, that in case all connected components are open, a subset is clopen iff it is a union of connected components.

While the first implication has been shown in this post, I'm trying to prove the opposite direction.

Let $(X,\tau)$ be a topological space with the assumptions from above. Further let $A \subseteq X$ be the union of a family $(U_i)_{i \in I}$ of connected components.

Of course, $A$ is open (arbitrary union of open sets). But why is $A$ closed? I'm thinking proof by contradiction, by showing that for $A \subsetneq \bar A$ one $U_{i_0}$ can't be maximal but I haven't had success so far.

Problem: Take $x \in \bar A \setminus A$ and its respective connected component $U_x$. The assumptions are not violated, if $U_x = \{x\}$. Following this path I get, that $\bar A$ is clopen.

Any hints?

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ The complement of $A$ is also a union of connected components... $\endgroup$ – kccu Jan 8 '16 at 17:36
  • $\begingroup$ @kccu: This does the trick. Thanks! $\endgroup$ – el_tenedor Jan 8 '16 at 17:39
1
$\begingroup$

A set $X$ is a disjoint union $(U_i)_{i\in I}$ where $U_i$ is a connected component, suppose that $Y\subset X, Y=\cup U_{j,j\in J\subset I}$ write $I=J\cup L$, the complement of $Y$ is $Z=\cup_{l\in L}U_l$. $Z$ is open, thus $Y$ is closed.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.