5
$\begingroup$

This is the definition of zero divisor in Hungerford's Algebra:

A zero divisor is an element of $R$ which is BOTH a left and a right zero divisor.

It follows a statement: It is easy to verify that a ring $R$ has no zero divisors if and only if the right and left cancellation laws hold in $R$; that is, for all $a,b,c\in R$ with $a\neq 0$, $$ab=ac~~~\text{ or }~~~ba=ca~~~\Rightarrow~~~ b=c.$$

I think it is not true. But I can't find a counterexample.

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Given that it is a "if and only if" statement, is there a direction where you think it is not true? And why do you think it is not true? $\endgroup$ – Thomas Andrews Jan 6 '16 at 18:00
  • $\begingroup$ If $a$ is a zero divisor, then $ab=a\cdot 0$ for some non-zero $b$, so there is no cancellation. Cancellation implies no zero divisors. So does no zero-divisors imply cancellation? No cancellation implies left- and right- zero divisors, but not necessarily both. $\endgroup$ – Thomas Andrews Jan 6 '16 at 18:05
3
$\begingroup$

Lemma: A ring has a left (or right) zero-divisor if and only if it has a zero divisor.

Proof: Assume $ab=0$ for $a,b\neq 0$.

If $ba=0$, you are done - $a$ is both a left and right zero divisor.

If $ba\neq 0$, then $a(ba)=(ab)a=0$ and $(ba)b=b(ab)=0$, so $ba$ is a left and right zero divisor.


Now it is much easier to prove your theorem.

If $ax=ay$ and $R$ has no zero-divisors, then $a(x-y)=0$. But, by the lemma, $R$ also has no left-zero divisors, so either $a=0$ or $x-y=0$.

Similarly for $xa=ya$.

On the other hand, if cancellation is true, then $a\cdot b=0=a\cdot 0$ means that either $a=0$ or $b=0$. So there can't be any left zero divisors, and thus no zero divisors.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks! It is surprised the existence of one-sided zero divisor implies that two-sided. $\endgroup$ – bfhaha Jan 6 '16 at 18:52
  • $\begingroup$ Yeah, surprised Hungerford leaves that out, unless this is later dealt with in an exercise. $\endgroup$ – Thomas Andrews Jan 6 '16 at 18:53
2
$\begingroup$

Suppose $ab = 0$ with $a, b \ne 0$. Either $ba = 0$ (which means $a$ and $b$ are zero-divisors), or $ba \ne 0$, in which case $ba$ is a zero-divisor because $a(ba) = 0$ and $(ba)b = 0$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.