From Folland's Analysis, suppose $\{E_j\}_1^\infty \subset \mathcal{A}$. Set

$$F_k = E_k \setminus \bigcup_{j=1}^{k-1}E_j$$

Then the $F_k$'s are disjoint, and $\bigcup_1^\infty E_j = \bigcup_1^\infty F_k$.

My question is, what if you let $x \in \bigcap_1^\infty E_j$? Then wouldn't $x \in \bigcup_1^{k-1}E_j$ for all $k$, which would imply $x \not \in F_k \implies \bigcup_1^\infty E_j \neq \bigcup_1^\infty F_k$?

I'm sure I'm just missing something really simple here, but I can't for the life of me figure out what it is!


Notice that $F_1 = E_1$. So every element $x \in \bigcap_{j=1}^\infty E_j \subseteq E_1$ is contained in $F_1$.

  • $\begingroup$ Oh right, that definitely clears things up for me. Thanks! $\endgroup$ – Danny Jan 5 '16 at 19:26

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.