$\mathfrak{sl}_2(\mathbb{R})$ and $\mathbb{R}^3$ as subalgebras of $\mathfrak{sl}_2(\mathbb{C})$ I have an exercise which asks to prove that the Lie algebra $\mathfrak{sl}_2(\mathbb{C})$ contains the real, non-isomorphic subalgebras $\mathfrak{sl}_2(\mathbb{R})$ and $\mathbb{R}^3$ and to show further that - as vector spaces - each of these two subalgebras spans $\mathfrak{sl}_2(\mathbb{C})$ over $\mathbb{C}$.
I'm a bit confused by this statement. Isn't a subalgebra of a Lie algebra simply a linear subspace $\mathfrak{h} \subseteq \mathfrak{g}$ such that $[\mathfrak{h},\mathfrak{h}] \subseteq \mathfrak{h}$? If yes, clearly multiplying an element of $\mathfrak{sl}_2(\mathbb{R})$ by a real number yields again an element of $\mathfrak{sl}_2(\mathbb{R})$, and the subspace is closed under the commutator too. On the other hand, I don't understand how to view $\mathbb{R}^3$ as a subspace of $\mathfrak{sl}_2(\mathbb{C})$.
I'm guessing I'm misunderstanding a crucial part of this exercise. Could anyone explain what is actually asked or how to view $\mathbb{R}^3$ as a subspace of $\mathfrak{sl}_2(\mathbb{C})$?
 A: Identify $\mathbb{C}$ with $\mathbb{R}^2$ and extend the monomorphism $x\mapsto (x,0)$ from $\mathbb{R}\hookrightarrow \mathbb{R}^2=\mathbb{C}$ to a monomorphism
$\mathfrak{sl}_2(\mathbb{R})\hookrightarrow \mathfrak{sl}_2(\mathbb{C})$. 
This is an injective Lie algebra homomorphism. The Lie algebra $\mathfrak{sl}_2(\mathbb{R})$ has an abelian subalgebra of dimension $1$, but not of dimension $2$. Hence the maximal dimension of an abelian (real) subalgebra of $\mathfrak{sl}_2(\mathbb{C})$ is equal to $2$. Hence there is no faithful morphism from $\mathbb{R}^3\hookrightarrow \mathfrak{sl}_2(\mathbb{C})$. 
As real vector spaces, $\dim \mathfrak{sl}_2(\mathbb{R})=\dim \mathbb{R}^3=3$ and $\dim \mathfrak{sl}_2(\mathbb{C})=6$. As vector space, consider $\mathfrak{sl}_2(\mathbb{R})$ as $3$-dimensional subspace of $\mathbb{R}^4=M_2(\mathbb{R})$, which is $\mathfrak{gl}_2(\mathbb{R})$ under the Lie bracket $[A,B]:=AB-BA$. 
A: You won't find any $\mathbb R$-subspace $\mathfrak h$ of $\mathfrak{sl}_2(\mathbb C)$ such that $[\mathfrak h,\mathfrak h]=0$ whose real dimension is $3$. In fact, you would have that $\mathfrak h_\mathbb C=\mathfrak h\oplus i\mathfrak h$ is a complex abelian sub-algebra of $\mathfrak{sl}_2(\mathbb C)$ whose complex dimension is $2$ or $3$. That means
$$
\mathfrak{sl}_2(\mathbb C)=\mathfrak h_\mathbb C\oplus V,
$$
where $V$ is a complex $1$-dimensional subspace, or
$$
\mathfrak{sl}_2(\mathbb C)=\mathfrak h_\mathbb C.
$$
So, in the firs case,
$$
\mathfrak{sl}_2(\mathbb C) = [ \mathfrak{sl}_2(\mathbb C), \mathfrak{sl}_2(\mathbb C) ] = [\mathfrak h_\mathbb C,\mathfrak h_\mathbb C]\oplus[\mathfrak h_\mathbb C,V]\oplus[V,V]=[\mathfrak h_\mathbb C,V].
$$
But $\mathfrak{sl}_2(\mathbb C)$ has complex dimension $3$ and $[\mathfrak h_\mathbb C,V]$ has complex dimension at most $2$. A contradiction. In the second case,
$$
\mathfrak{sl}_2(\mathbb C) = [ \mathfrak{sl}_2(\mathbb C), \mathfrak{sl}_2(\mathbb C) ] = [\mathfrak h_\mathbb C,\mathfrak h_\mathbb C]=0.
$$
Again, a contradiction.
So, you can view the $3$-dimensional abelian Lie algebra $\mathbb R^3$ as a $\mathbb R$-subspace of $\mathfrak{sl}_2(\mathbb C)$ but not as a sub-algebra of it.
From what you wrote, my educated guess about it would be that the exercise is really about you noting that:


*

*$\mathfrak{sl}_2(\mathbb R)$ can be canonically included in $\mathfrak{sl}_2(\mathbb C)$;

*$\mathbb R^3$ can NOT be included (or viewed as OP said) in $\mathfrak{sl}_2(\mathbb C)$;

*$\mathfrak{sl}_2(\mathbb R)$ and $\mathbb R^3$ span different complex Lie algebras.
Edited after OP's comment:
Consider $\mathfrak{su}(2)$ the real Lie algebra  of the $2\times 2$ traceless antihermitian matrices:
$$
\left\{
\left(
\begin{array}{cc}
i\alpha & \beta + i\gamma \\
- \beta + i\gamma & -i\alpha 
\end{array}
\right)
: \alpha,\beta,\gamma\in\mathbb R
\right\}.
$$
You can check directly (if you haven't yet) that $\mathfrak{su}(2)$ is a real Lie algebra (with the matrix commutator as the Lie bracket). Also, you can realize it as a real subalgebra of $\mathfrak{sl}_2(\mathbb C)$.
The Lie algebra $(\mathbb R^3,\times)$ (where $\times$ denotes the vector product in $\mathbb R^3$) is isomorphic to $\mathfrak{su}(2)$ by the map:
$$
(x,y,z)\to\frac{1}{2}\left(
\begin{array}{cc}
ix & y + iz \\
- y + iz & -ix 
\end{array}
\right).
$$
So, this is one of the ways you can realize $(\mathbb R^3,\times)$ as a real sub-algebra of $\mathfrak{sl}_2(\mathbb C)$. 
