0
$\begingroup$

I'm reading Probability Theory: The Logic of Science by Jaynes. And while I'm reading section 7.3, he proofed that Gauss distribution is a necessary condition for the equality of maximum likelihood estimate and sample mean.

But he just derived Gauss distribution from a special case of sample mean, how does that imply a necessary condition? It is like if we know a + b = 0,then we assume a = 1, b = -1, from this special case we get a - b = 2, but that doesn't implies a - b = 2 is a necessary condition of a + b = 0.

( You may read Chapter 7 of this book online if you don't have this book).

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ The proof in Jaynes is rather awfully documented. You can find a more interesting [reference here][1], in particular check out "The Proof" on page 105-106. In particular, the heart of the "proof" relies on the assumption that the maximum likelihood equation holds for all samples, in particular the adhoc choice that Jaynes gives. [1]: med.mcgill.ca/epidemiology/hanley/bios601/GaussianModel/… $\endgroup$ – Alex R. Jan 1 '16 at 6:09
  • $\begingroup$ @AlexR. : Thanks. But I think you've give the wrong link, it is the link of Jaynes' proof, which is in my question. $\endgroup$ – Bin Wang Jan 1 '16 at 8:30
  • $\begingroup$ Whoops. Here's the right link: maa.org/sites/default/files/pdf/upload_library/22/Allendoerfer/… $\endgroup$ – Alex R. Jan 1 '16 at 20:41

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.