2
$\begingroup$

I have been playing around with the idea of thinking of the set of real valued functions $\mathbb{R}^{\mathbb{R}}$ as the set of uncountably long tuples in $\mathbb{R}$-dimensional space, and I have a question which I have had trouble answering for myself which I would like some help with.

I was wondering how one could construct an explicit bijection from $\mathbb{R}^{\mathbb{R}} \to \mathbb{R}^{(a,b)}$ (for $a,b\in \mathbb{R}$) since $|(a,b)|=|\mathbb{R}|$. My intuition tells me that the bijection should be defined in terms of the range of each function (since that is what distinguishes them), but I have had trouble determining an explicit formula. Also, are there any other interesting bijections that we can obtain, or homeomorphisms if we equip $\mathbb{R}^{\mathbb{R}}$ with the metric $d(f,g)=sup_{x\in \mathbb{R}} \frac{d(fx, gx)}{1+d(fx, gx)}$?

I think it would be interesting to see what we could continuously deform the space of real valued functions (or a subspace of it) into, but I'm having trouble constructing a bijection (let alone a bicontinuous one) to get me started.

Thanks in advance

$\endgroup$
3
$\begingroup$

Let $f: (a,b) \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ be a bijection. Then,

$$\mathbb{R}^{\mathbb{R}} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}^{(a,b)}$$ $$g \mapsto g \circ f$$

is a bijection, with inverse being

$$\mathbb{R}^{(a,b)} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}^{\mathbb{R}}$$ $$g \mapsto g \circ f^{-1}.$$

As for a homeomorphism, note that this is an isometry.


Why it's an isometry:

Take two functions $\xi, \eta : \mathbb{R} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$. Denote by $d_1$ the distance in $\mathbb{R}^{\mathbb{R}}$ and $d_2$ the distance in $\mathbb{R}^{(a,b)}$. Then, we have that $$d_1(\xi,\eta)=\sup_{x \in \mathbb{R}} \frac{d(\xi(x),\eta(x))}{1+d(\xi(x),\eta(x))}=\sup_{x \in (a,b)} \frac{d(\xi(f(x)),\eta(f(x)))}{1+d(\xi(f(x)),\eta(f(x)))}=d_2(\xi \circ f, \eta \circ f),$$ where the middle equality holds due to the fact that $f$ is a bijection.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Would you mind editing the post to elaborate on the isometry aspect of it? (please and thank you). $\endgroup$ – Brandon Thomas Van Over Dec 30 '15 at 7:14
  • $\begingroup$ @SirJective I edited. Hope it clarifies : ) $\endgroup$ – Aloizio Macedo Dec 30 '15 at 19:04
  • $\begingroup$ Yes it does thank you very much. Do you know of any results regard equivalences between spaces like these? Is there something familiar that we prefer to think of $\mathbb{R}^{\mathbb{R}}$ as? $\endgroup$ – Brandon Thomas Van Over Dec 30 '15 at 20:11

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.