3
$\begingroup$

$$0\le x^2 + z^2 \le 1$$

$$0 \le y^2 + z^2 \le 1$$

I want to compute the volume of the intersection.

Sketching it out on paper is sort of nice: I see cross-sections that are disks, the first cylinder, the y-coordinate is free to vary, and for the second cylinder, the x-coordinate is free to vary.

The intersection, I would guess, seems to be something spherical.

So how can I pin down the actual set of points?

Well, one thing I thought of was to try to manipulate both inequalities to make use of the equation of a sphere, so I try looking at these inequalities instead:

$$y^2\le x^2 + y^2 + z^2 \le 1 +y^2$$

$$x^2 \le x^2 +y^2 + z^2 \le 1+x^2$$

Am I heading in the right direction? Where can I go from here?

Thanks,

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ It's definitely not a sphere, not sure you can say much more about it than it's the intersection of two perpendicular cylinders. $\endgroup$ – Gregory Grant Dec 28 '15 at 23:51
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Hi Professor Grant, thanks for your comment, and especially for noting the orthogonality relationship. I think I am almost there... $\endgroup$ – user301446 Dec 29 '15 at 0:13
  • $\begingroup$ This comment is to link this post as one of the (abstract) duplicates to the current choice of mother/target post. $\endgroup$ – Lee David Chung Lin Jan 22 at 10:29
6
$\begingroup$

The intersection of two cylinders is called a Steinmetz solid. You can give a description of the edges of the solid by

$$x = \pm z, \quad y = \pm \sqrt{1 - z^2}$$

and use these to give corresponding inequalities.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Hi @user, thanks so much for your quick response. Well, using the above inequalities, I do see these coming out: $x = +/- \sqrt{1-z^2}$ and $y = +/- \sqrt{1-z^2}$. How come you don't mention this guy: $x = +/- \sqrt{1-z^2}$? ... is it already like implied somewhere in your description? Thanks, $\endgroup$ – user301446 Dec 28 '15 at 23:59
  • $\begingroup$ Ooh @user, I think I see what you are saying ... $\endgroup$ – user301446 Dec 29 '15 at 0:00
  • $\begingroup$ So my above comment, I have basically found my integration limits for both x and y...is that correct, @user? And now, I just have to find the integration limits for $z$ ... $\endgroup$ – user301446 Dec 29 '15 at 0:01
  • $\begingroup$ But, solving for $z$ in each inequality gives us two upper and lower limits of integration, which is strange, @user ... $\endgroup$ – user301446 Dec 29 '15 at 0:03
  • $\begingroup$ Perhaps the limits for $z$ is simply +/- 1, since the cross-sections are disks of radius 1, @user ... what do you think? Thanks, $\endgroup$ – user301446 Dec 29 '15 at 0:06
7
$\begingroup$

I could not resist to model this in GeoGebra.

Steinmetz solid

Zenith is $(0, 0, 1)$ and nadir $(0, 0, -1)$. A slice at height $z$ is a square with side length $$ a = 2 \sqrt{1-z^2} $$ so $$ dV = (2 \sqrt{1-z^2})^2 dz = 4(1-z^2) dz $$ slices

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ haha...@mvw, thanks so much. I am practicing for exams, so I think I had better pin down the algebra on paper for now. Hmm...so the intersection is indeed not spherical, as Professor Grant points out in his comment above... $\endgroup$ – user301446 Dec 29 '15 at 0:11
  • $\begingroup$ I hoped its surface intersection operation could deal with this one, but that is either too much yet for GeoGebra or I am doing something wrong. $\endgroup$ – mvw Dec 29 '15 at 0:14

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.