9
$\begingroup$

Is it possible to obtain a closed form of the following integral? $$\int_0^1\log (- \log x)\log \left(\frac{1+x}{1-x}\right)\,dx$$ I've made the change of variable $$t=\frac{1+x}{1-x} $$ but I feel like I'm turning in circles...

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Since the range of the integration is bounded between $0$ and $1$, I suggest you to use Taylor Series for the log functions. $\endgroup$ – Von Neumann Dec 25 '15 at 1:03
  • $\begingroup$ @Kim Peek II Please, can you elaborate on the Taylor series? $\endgroup$ – ebeq-integrator Dec 25 '15 at 1:08
  • $\begingroup$ Let $~I(k)=\displaystyle\int_0^1(-\ln x)^k\ln\bigg(\dfrac{1+x}{1-x}\bigg)~dx ~=~ k!~\bigg[2\ln2-\sum_{n=2}^{k+1}\frac{\zeta(n)}{2^{n-1}}~\bigg].~$ Then your expression is $I'(0).$ $\endgroup$ – Lucian Dec 25 '15 at 3:56
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Not sure if this is considered a closed form, but one may express the integral as $$I=2\sum^\infty_{n=0}\frac{-\gamma-\ln(2n+2)}{(2n+1)(2n+2)}= \gamma_1(1,1)-\gamma_1\left(1,\frac12\right)-2\gamma\ln2-2\ln^2 2$$ where $\gamma_1(a,b)$ is a "Poly-Stieltjes" constant as defined by Olivier Oloa here (math.stackexchange.com/questions/364452/…) Another interesting fact is $$I=2\ln2\ln\pi-\pi\int^1_0\ln\Gamma(x)\left(\frac\pi 2\cos(\pi x)+\ln\cot\left(\frac{\pi x}{2}\right)\sin(\pi x)\right)\ dx$$ $\endgroup$ – M.N.C.E. Dec 25 '15 at 7:19
5
$\begingroup$

We have the following closed form.

Proposition. $$ \int_0^1\log (- \log x)\log \left(\frac{1+x}{1-x}\right)\,dx=\gamma_1-2\ln^2 2-2\gamma \ln 2 -\gamma_1\Big({1,\small\frac12}\Big)\tag{$\star$} $$

where $\gamma_1$ is the Stieltjes constant, $$\gamma_1 = \lim_{N\to+\infty}\left(\sum_{n=1}^N \frac{\log n}n-\int_1^N\frac{\log t}t\:dt\right)$$ and where $\gamma_1(a,b)$ is the poly-Stieltjes constant, $$\gamma_1(a,b) = \lim_{N\to+\infty}\left(\sum_{n=1}^N \frac{\log (n+a)}{n+b}-\int_1^N\frac{\log t}t\:dt\right)\!.$$

Proof. One may recall the classic integral representation of the Euler gamma function $$ \frac{\Gamma(s)}{(a+1)^s}=\int_0^\infty t^{s-1} e^{-(a+1)t}\:dt, \qquad s>0,\, a>-1. \tag1 $$ By differentiating $(1)$ with respect to $s$, putting $s=1$ and making the change of variable $x=e^{-t}$, we get $$ \int_0^1x^a\log\left(-\log x\right)\:dx=-\frac{\gamma+\log(a+1)}{a+1},\qquad a>-1, \tag2 $$

where $\displaystyle \gamma=\lim_{N\to+\infty}\left(\sum_{n=1}^N \frac1n-\int_1^N\frac{dt}t\right)$ is the Euler-Mascheroni constant.

From the standard Taylor series expansion, $$ -\log (1-x)= \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{x^n}n, \qquad |x|<1,\tag3 $$ one gets $$ \log (1+x)-\log (1-x)=2 \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{x^{2n+1}}{2n+1}, \qquad |x|<1.\tag4 $$ One may write the given integral as $$ \int_0^1\log (- \log x)\log \left(\frac{1+x}{1-x}\right)\,dx =\int_0^1\log (- \log x) \left(\log (1+x)-\log (1-x)\right)dx $$ then, inserting $(4)$ into the latter integrand and using $(2)$, we obtain $$ \begin{align} \int_0^1\log (- \log x)\log \left(\frac{1+x}{1-x}\right)\,dx&=2\int_0^1\log (- \log x) \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{x^{2n+1}}{2n+1}\:dx\\ &=2\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac1{2n+1}\int_0^1 x^{2n+1}\log (- \log x)\:dx\\ &=-2\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{\gamma+\log(2n+2)}{(2n+1)(2n+2)}\\ &=-\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{2\left(\gamma+\ln 2 \right)}{(2n+1)(2n+2)}-\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{2\log (n+1)}{(2n+1)(2n+2)}.\tag5 \end{align} $$ On the one hand, using Abel's theorem and using $(3)$, one has $$ \begin{align} \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac2{(2n+1)(2n+2)}&=\lim_{x \to 1^-}\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{2x^{2n+2}}{(2n+1)(2n+2)}\\ &=\lim_{x \to 1^-}\left( (1+x)\log(1+x)+(1-x)\log(1-x)\right)\\ &=2\ln2.\tag6 \end{align} $$ On the other hand, using Theorem 2 here one has $$ \begin{align} \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{2\log (n+1)}{(2n+1)(2n+2)}=-\gamma_1+\gamma_1\Big({1,\small\frac12}\Big),\tag7 \end{align} $$ since $\gamma_1(1,1)=\gamma_1$.

Finally, bringing all the steps together gives $(\star)$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Putting the two and two together, it would follow that it is possible to generalize $S(k)=\displaystyle\sum_{n=2}^{k+1}\frac{\zeta(n)}{2^{n-1}}$ to non-natural arguments using the aforementioned $\gamma$ constants, would it not ? $\endgroup$ – Lucian Dec 25 '15 at 21:03
  • $\begingroup$ @Lucian It is not difficult to generalize $S(k)=\displaystyle\sum_{n=2}^{k+1}\frac{\zeta(n)}{2^{n-1}}$ to non-natural arguments: switch the two summations. Then differentiating your $I(k)$ with respect to $k$ and putting $k=0$, you arrive at $(5)$ above (with no proof). But, in my humble opinion, to get an analytic closed-form here, the step of poly-Stieltjes constants is decisive. $\endgroup$ – Olivier Oloa Dec 26 '15 at 10:57

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.