7
$\begingroup$

Is there a $f : \mathbb{R}_+ \to \mathbb{R}_+$ such that :

  1. $f$ is an increasing bijective map of $\mathbb{R}_+$ into itself.

  2. For all $\displaystyle\sum_n \frac{1}{x_n}$ where $(x_n)$ is increasing and potitive : $$\sum \frac{1}{x_n} \; \text{diverge}\; \Longrightarrow \sum \frac{1}{x_nf(x_n)} \; \text{diverge}$$

(From a French oral examination)

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Nope, the question is to find (or prove there is not) such a $ f $ $\endgroup$ – M.LTA Dec 23 '15 at 23:09
  • $\begingroup$ @math635 The question was whether there exists an $f$ with the given property - saying $f(x)=x$ doesn't work doesn't say much about that. $\endgroup$ – David C. Ullrich Dec 23 '15 at 23:10
  • $\begingroup$ My first thought is maybe something like $f(x) = \log(x+1)$, because it works for $x_{n} = n$, but I don't know if it holds in general. $\endgroup$ – DMcMor Dec 23 '15 at 23:18
10
$\begingroup$

Edit: What I wrote is not quite right. Or maybe it's right. See comment at bottom.

There is no such $f$.

If $f$ is an increasing bijection there exists $y_j>j$ such that $f(y_j)>j$. Let $N_j$ be the smallest positive integer with $$N_j\frac1{y_j}>\frac1j.$$Since $1/y_j<1/j$ it follows that $$N_j\frac1{y_j}\le \frac2j.$$

Let $(x_n)$ be the sequence consisting of $y_1$ repeated $N_1$ times, followed by $y_2$ repeated $N_2$ times, etc. Then $$\sum_n\frac1{x_n}=\sum_j N_j\frac1{y_j}>\sum_j\frac1j=\infty,$$while $$ \sum_n\frac1{x_nf(x_n)}=\sum_jN_j\frac1{y_j\,f(y_j)}\le2\sum_j\frac1{j^2}<\infty.$$

Comment: I missed the condition that the $x_n$ are supposed to be increasing. We can certainly make the $y_j$ increasing, in which case the $x_n$ are non-decreasing, which is what "increasing" often means. If we want the $x_n$ to be strictly increasing, start with $y_j$ strictly increasing, define $x_n$ as above, and then modify $x_n$ a tiny bit to make the sequence strictly increasing. If the modification is small enough this will not change the convergence or divergence of the two series. (For example, given $x_n$ as above we can certainly find a strictly increasing sequence $(x_n')$ such that $x_n\le x_n'\le 2x_n$; note that $f(x_n')\ge f(x_n)$.)

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ shouldn't the $x_i$'s be increasing? $\endgroup$ – math635 Dec 23 '15 at 23:56
  • $\begingroup$ I missed that. Doesn't matter... $\endgroup$ – David C. Ullrich Dec 23 '15 at 23:57
  • $\begingroup$ Yes I meant non decreasing but still not the main part of the question. You did the job ! Elegant solution ! $\endgroup$ – M.LTA Dec 24 '15 at 0:24

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.