2
$\begingroup$

If we have two topological spaces X,Y and a continuous function between f, and $f(a)=b$.

We get a function between the fundamental groups:

$f_*: \pi(X,a)\rightarrow\pi(Y,b)$, which is given by $f_*([g])=[f \circ g]$. But it is also so that f must be both surjective and injective for $f_*$ to be injective?

If you get have that $[f\circ g_1]=[f\circ g_2]$, can you please tell me why we do not get that $[g_1]=[g_2]$ if we only have that f is injective, we need surjectivity aswell?

PS: My question comes by wondering about the classical example from $S^1\rightarrow B^2$, if we just use the identity we get that f is injective, but not surjective, and it is proved that the fundamental group of the last one is trivial and the first one is not. So $f_*$ is not injective. But I do not understand where the details go wrong.

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

$f$ doesn't need to be neither surjective nor injective. Consider just $X:=\Bbb R^2\setminus \{0\}$ and $f: (X,1)\to (X,1)$ defined by $x\mapsto x/|x|$. This clearly induces the identity on fundamental groups.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Can you please explain how you get that it is the identity on the fundamental groups? Sorry, I am quite bad in this. $\endgroup$ – user119615 Dec 23 '15 at 2:24
  • $\begingroup$ @user119615 Because any loop $l(s)$ and $l(s)/|l(s)|$ are homotopic in $X$ via the homotopy $l(s)/(t+(1-t)|l(s)|)$. You easily verify that this is a well defined homotopy in $X$. $\endgroup$ – Peter Franek Dec 23 '15 at 8:00
0
$\begingroup$

Consider the inclusion map $j\colon S^1 \to B^2$ defined by $j(x) = x$ for all $x \in S^1$, which is certainly continuous and injective. We claim that there exists no retraction map (that is, there is no continuous surjection) of the form $r\colon B^2 \to S^1$.

Suppose, towards a contradiction, that such a retraction $r$ did exist. Then since $r \circ j = \text{id}_{S^1}$, we know that $r$ is surjective and $j$ is injective. By using fundamental groups, we also know that $r_* \circ j_* = \text{id}_{\pi_1(S^1, s_0)}$ so that $r_*$ is surjective and $j_*$ is injective. But this is absurd, since $\pi_1(S^1, s_0)$ is nontrivial and $\pi_1(B^2, b_0)$ is trivial, so $j_*\colon \pi_1(S^1, s_0) \to \pi_1(B^2, b_0)$ is not injective. Hence, we conclude that no such retraction exists, as desired. $~~\blacksquare$

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.