I have troubles with understanding a few things in a proof of implicit function theorem (Rosenlicht's Introduction to Analysis). It would be great if somebody could explain the highlighted parts to me. I know it's lengthy, sorry about it. I have problems with:

Green - Is there any intuitive way of explaining why we have chosen such numbers? Geometric interpretation maybe?

Red - I don't get it why $\frac{\partial f} {\partial y}$ is nonzero there.

enter image description here


Green: This is an artificial complication. Since $F_y$ is continuous and $F_y(a,b)=0$, the set $\{(x,y):|F_y(x,y)|<1/2\}$ is open and contains $(a,b)$. Thus there is also an open rectangular neighborhood $(a-h,a+h)×(b-k,b+k)$ that is contained in that set.

The complication comes from first taking a disk of radius $r$ contained in that set $\{|F_y|<1/2\}$ and then inscribing a rectangle inside that disk. There is no convincing reason to go first via circular neighborhoods.

Red: $F(x,y)=y-K·f(x,y)$, thus $F_y=1-K·f_y$ or $K·f_y=1-F_y$. Now since $|F_y|<1/2$, there is no way to get $f_y=0$, more, $|f_y|>1/(2K)$.

  • $\begingroup$ Thank you so much! I really appreciate that you went through this proof. $\endgroup$ – luka5z Dec 17 '15 at 18:05

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.