For simplicity in simulation, I have changed the sample
space to $E = \{1,2,3,4\}.$ With this notation, notice that
there will be a last visit to 'transient' state 4. On each visit to
state 4 there is a 50-50 chance of movement to state 1 or 2,
and no possibility of return to state 4 from there. So by
simulating $X_{10}$ repeatedly, you're checking how likely
the chain can still visit state 4 after the tenth transition,
and how likely it is that the chain has gotten 'absorbed' into 'persistent' states
1 and 2 by then.
In order to simulate the first ten $transitions$ of the chain repeatedly
as required, you need to know how to do the simulation once.
Here is such a simulation using R statistical software. We begin by
entering the transition matrix $P$ and then using it for simulation.
(The transition matrix $P$ can be written on a single line, but it is
easier to visualize as entered below.
P = (1/4)*matrix(c(0,4,0,0,
4,0,0,0,
0,0,2,2,
1,1,1,1), nrow=4, byrow=T)
m = 11 # number of steps simulated
x = numeric(m); x[1] = 4 # null 11-vector; chain starts in state 4.
for (i in 2:m) {
x[i] = sample(1:4, 1, prob=P[x[i-1],]) # applicable row of P used
}
x
## 4 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1
Two additional runs give
## 4 3 4 3 3 4 1 2 1 2 1
## 4 4 4 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1
Now, for $B = 100,000$ simulations of the state visited after 10 transitions, we wrap an
outer loop around the program above.
P = (1/4)*matrix(c(0,4,0,0,
4,0,0,0,
0,0,2,2,
1,1,1,1), nrow=4, byrow=T)
B = 100000; PATH = matrix(0, nrow=B, ncol=11)
for (j in 1:B) {
m = 11 # number of steps simulated
x = numeric(m); x[1] = 4 # (initially null) 11-vector; chain starts in state 4.
for (i in 2:m) {
x[i] = sample(1:4, 1, prob=P[x[i-1],]) # applicable row of P used for sim
}
PATH[j,] = x
}
table(PATH[,11])/B
## 1 2 3 4
## 0.48006 0.48189 0.01855 0.01950
P10[4,]
## 0.48122883 0.48122883 0.01877117 0.01877117
The last row of $P^{10}$ shown above is found by matrix multiplication (code not shown). As suggested in the Comments by
@Ian and @user230329 there is very good agreement
with the simulation results.
An advantage of capturing all of the steps visited in the matrix
PATH
is that a similar comparison can be made for results after four
transitions:
table(PATH[,5])/B
## 1 2 3 4
## 0.39295 0.39473 0.10562 0.10670
P4[4,]
## 0.3945313 0.3945313 0.1054688 0.1054688
Here we see that already after only just a few steps the
chain has more likely than not moved from the transient states
to the persistent ones.
My guess is that the reason you were asked to do some simulation
is to develop intuition how the chain moves. Perhaps soon in
your continuing study of Markov chains you will see analytic
formulas for the mean time spent in various transient states
before 'absorption' into the persistent states.