$$ f(x) = \begin{cases} x + 2x^2\sin(1/x) & \text{ for }x \neq 0 \\ 0 & \text{ for } x = 0\end{cases} $$

This is another exam practice question I am working on.

I simply took the derivative:

$$f'(x) = 1 + 4x\sin(1/x) - 2x^4\cos(1/x) $$

Now we see that $f'$ is undefined at $x = 0$, therefore $f'$ cannot be continuous there.

Is this sufficient to answer this question? The previous part of the question required me to use the limit definition of the derivative to show that $f'(0) = 1$. Would I need to use the limit definition here as well?

Thanks for any feedback!


No. What you have is incorrect.

$f'(x)$ is in-fact well defined at all $x$ including $0$. Just that $f'$ is not continuous at $0$.

When you compute the derivative $f'(x)$ as $$f'(x) = 1 + 4x \sin(1/x) - 2 \cos(1/x),$$ this computation is valid only when $x \neq 0$ (There is an error in your derivative computation for $x \neq 0$. There is no $x^4$ infront off $\cos(1/x)$).

To compute the derivative at $x=0$, lets go back to the definition of the derivative at $0$. We have that $$f'(0) = \lim_{h \to 0} \dfrac{f(0+h) - f(0)}{h} = \lim_{h \to 0} \dfrac{h + 2h^2 \sin(1/h) - 0}{h} = \lim_{h \to 0} \left(1 + 2h \sin(1/h) \right) = 1$$ In the above derivation, we have used the fact that $\displaystyle \lim_{h \to 0} h \sin(1/h) =0$.

This is because of the fact that $-1 \leq \sin(1/h) \leq 1$ and hence $$-\lvert h \rvert \leq h \sin(1/h) \leq \lvert h \rvert \implies -\lim_{h \to 0} \lvert h \rvert \leq \lim_{h \to 0} h \sin(1/h) \leq \lim_{h \to 0} \lvert h \rvert$$

Whereas for $x \neq 0$, we have that $f'(x) = 1 + 4x \sin(1/x) - 2 \cos(1/x)$. Putting these together, we get that $$ f'(x) = \begin{cases} 1 + 4x \sin(1/x) - 2 \cos(1/x) & x \neq 0\\ 1 & x = 0\end{cases}$$Now you can see that $f'(x)$ is discontinuous at $0$ even though $f'(x)$ is well-defined at all $x$ including $x=0$ where $f'(0) = 1$. However, \begin{align} \lim_{x \to 0} \left(1 + 4x \sin(1/x) - 2 \cos(1/x) \right) & = 1 + \lim_{x \to 0} 4x \sin(1/x) - \lim_{x \to 0} 2 \cos(1/x)\\ & = 1 - \lim_{x \to 0} 2 \cos(1/x)\\ \text{ And the above limit doesn't exists} \end{align} Hence, $\lim_{x \to 0} f'(x)$ doesn't exist. This means that even though $f'(0)$ is well-defined and in-fact $f'(x)$ is well-defined for all $x$, $f'(x)$ is not continuous at $x=0$.

  • $\begingroup$ Thank you! Very well explained! $\endgroup$ – JackReacher Jun 13 '12 at 7:56

Enough to show $\cos(1/x)$ is not continuous at $0$, take $x_n=\frac{1}{n\pi}$ and $y_n=\frac{2}{(2n+1)\pi}$ both the sequence converges to $0$ but functional sequence $\cos(1/x_n)$ and $\cos(1/y_n)$ converges to $-1$ and $0$ respectively in different limit. So $lim_{x\rightarrow 0}\cos(1/x)$ does not exist, hence not continuous and hence your function is not continuous.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.