0
$\begingroup$

Let $ X_1 $ and $ X_2 $ be iid with pdf $$ f(x)=\lambda e^{-\lambda x}, \quad \lambda>0, \quad x \in (0, \infty)$$ Find the density function of $Z = X_1+X_2$.

I tried to solve it using this formula: $$ f_Z \left( z \right) = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} f_X \left( z - y \right) f_Y \left( y \right) d y $$

$$ \lambda^2 \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{-\lambda (z-w)} \cdot e^{-\lambda w} dw= \lambda^2 \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{-\lambda z} dw$$ but the integral diverges...

I tried the second way: $$ F(x) = 1-e^{-\lambda z} \quad Z=X_1+X_2 = 2X_1$$

$ F_{2X_1}(z)=P(2X_1 \le z) = P(X_1 \le \frac{t}{2})=1-e^{\frac{-\lambda}{2} z} \\ $

$ f_Z(z)=\frac{-\lambda}{2} e ^{\frac{-\lambda}{2} z} $ Is it ok?

Which way is good?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ $f_X(x)\neq e^{-x}$ when $x$ is negative. $\endgroup$ – T.J. Gaffney Dec 7 '15 at 21:43
  • $\begingroup$ Your second attempt seems successful. $\endgroup$ – T.J. Gaffney Dec 7 '15 at 21:44
  • $\begingroup$ For the first attempt, integrate from $z$ to infinity. The second attempt is wrong, $2X_1$ and $X_1+X_2$ have very different distributions. $\endgroup$ – André Nicolas Dec 7 '15 at 21:49
0
$\begingroup$

Specifically, you should be guided by the general result $X_{1}+X_{2} \sim Gamma(2, \lambda)$. In particular, using convolution you should integrate over $(-\infty, z]$, because, as @Gaffney said, the pdf is $0$ for negative values. Hence,

\begin{align} f_Z \left( z \right) &= \int_{-\infty}^{z} f_X \left( z - y \right) f_Y \left( y \right) \mathrm{d} y\\ &= \int_{-\infty}^{z} \lambda e^{-\lambda\left( z - y \right)} \lambda e^{-\lambda y} \mathrm{d} y \\ &=\lambda ^2 e^{-\lambda z}z, \quad z\ge 0 . \end{align} Which is pdf of $Erlang(2,\lambda)$. Another possible way to show it is by using MGF of the exponential distribution.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I don't get it why the limits are $ -\infty$ and $z$. y >=0. $\endgroup$ – maro Dec 7 '15 at 22:07
  • $\begingroup$ @maro You are right. I corrected the answer. Regrading the limits - note that $f _{X}(z-y) =0$ for $y > z$, because the support of the exponential r.v is $[0,\infty)$. $\endgroup$ – V. Vancak Dec 7 '15 at 22:11
  • $\begingroup$ So is $Gamma(2, \lambda)$ (the same as) = $\lambda ^2 e^{-\lambda z}z$? $\endgroup$ – maro Dec 8 '15 at 23:28
  • $\begingroup$ @maro Yes, more formally: $\frac{\lambda^2}{\Gamma(2)}e^{-\lambda z}z^{2-1}$, where $\Gamma(2) = (2-1)!$. $\endgroup$ – V. Vancak Dec 8 '15 at 23:40

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.