1
$\begingroup$

Let $K$ be a field and let $f\in K[x]$ be an irreducible polynomial, of degree $n>0$.

Say that $f(x)$ has atleast two roots, $\alpha,\beta$, where both are not in $K$.

We take $K[x]/\langle f\rangle$ and looking at $\alpha = x+\langle f\rangle$ has:

$$f(\alpha) = a_n\alpha^n+a_{n-1}\alpha^{n-1}+\cdots+a_0$$ $$= a_n(x+\langle f \rangle)^n+a_{n-1}(x+\langle f \rangle)^{n-1}+\cdots + (1+\langle f\rangle)a_0$$ $$=a_n x^n+a_{n-1}x^{n-1}+\cdots+a_0 + \langle f\rangle = 0$$

So then $\alpha$ is a root of $f(x)\in K[x]/\langle f\rangle = L$.

Now, say that this factors $f(x)=(x-\alpha)g(x)$ and $g(x)$ is irreducible. We can now take:

$$K(\alpha)[y]/\langle g(y)\rangle$$

and look at $\beta = y+\langle g\rangle$.

$$g(\beta) =\cdots$$

So then $\beta$ is a root of $g(x)\in K(\alpha)(\beta)$


An arbitary element of $K(\alpha)$ looks like $K(\alpha)=\{a_{n-1}\alpha^{n-1}+\cdots + a_0:a_i\in K\}$

  • One what does an arbitrary element of $K(\alpha)(\beta)$ look like.
  • How do I reconcile the $f$ being of degree $n$, and the proof of $L= K[x]/\langle f \rangle$ utilises the degree $n$?
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I think it will help if you instead of $L[x]$ use $L[y]$. Then you will see that a general element in $L(\beta)$ can be represented by an element of $K[x,y]$. $\endgroup$ – Arthur Dec 5 '15 at 10:01
0
$\begingroup$

If you know what $L(\alpha)$ looks like, for any field $L$ and algebraic element $\alpha$ (over $L$), then you can easily figure out your first question. You have already noted that $$K(\alpha)=\{a_{n-1}\alpha^{n-1}+\cdots + a_0:a_i\in K\}$$

So an arbitrary element of $K(\alpha)$ can be written slightly more concisely as $$\sum_{i = 0}^{n-1} a_i\alpha^i,\quad a_i\in K$$

Now just apply the same reasoning to $K(\alpha,\beta) = K(\alpha)(\beta)$. An arbitrary element of this field will be:

$$\sum_{j = 0}^{m} b_j\beta^j,\quad b_j\in K(\alpha)$$

for an appropriate $m$. Now just expand each of the $b_j$:

$$\sum_{j = 0}^{m} \left(\sum_{i = 0}^{n-1} a_{ij}\alpha^i\right)\beta^j,\quad a_i\in K$$

which simplifies to

$$\sum_{j = 0}^{m} \sum_{i = 0}^{n-1} a_{ij}\alpha^i \beta^j,\quad a_i\in K$$

In other words, they are just bivariate polynomials in $\alpha,\beta$, of limited degree in each.

I'm not quite sure what your second bullet means, could you clarify?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks, I am reading your answer to my first bullet point, it makes sense to me. For the second bullet point, I meant that my proof for $K(\alpha)$ relies on the degree $n$ of $f$, where, when I get to $K(\alpha)[y]/\langle g\rangle$ I am not sure what degree I should be using for $g(y)$. Just $n-1$ if I assume that $\alpha$ is not a repeated root? $\endgroup$ – I Won a fight against a clown Dec 5 '15 at 12:43
  • $\begingroup$ Oh, I see now. That's actually why I only said "for appropriate $m$". I may be wrong (I can't think of an example right now), but I don't think that $g$ can be assumed to be irreducible. The reason I think this is because $\alpha$ could be a multiple root in $L$. Though, upon searching a little bit, it seems this only happens in characteristic $p > 0$: math.uconn.edu/~kconrad/blurbs/galoistheory/separable1.pdf (starting at theorem 2.8 is what I refer to). However, in characteristic $0$, $g(x)$ is irreducible and of degree $n-1$, by which in my answer the appropriate $m$ is $n-2$. $\endgroup$ – GPerez Dec 5 '15 at 13:05

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.