11
$\begingroup$

Prove that $$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{x^n \log(n!)}{n!} \sim x \log(x) e^x \,\,\,\text{as}\,\,\, x \to \infty$$ and $$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{(-x)^n \log(n!)}{n!} \to 0 \,\,\,\text{as}\,\,\, x \to \infty$$ This question is related to my previous question. My heuristic approach is that the sum's major contribution comes from $n\approx x$ term, so

$$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{x^n \log(n!)}{n!} \sim \frac{x^x\log(x!)}{x!}$$ but using the Stirling formula twice leads to $$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{x^n \log(n!)}{n!} \sim \frac{\sqrt{x}\log(x)}{\sqrt{2\pi}}e^x$$ But this reasoning is flawed and I believe I should not ignore all the other terms. (Which I believe to account for $\sqrt{2\pi x}$factor) What kind of approach may give the wanted asymptotic behavior? Any kind of hint is welcome.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ have u tried Euler-Mac Laurin formula? $\endgroup$ – tired Dec 2 '15 at 17:46
  • $\begingroup$ I proved that $\sum_{n<x} \frac{x^n \log(n!)}{n!} \ll x\log(x)e^x$, so it remains to prove that$\sum_{n\geq x} \frac{x^n \log(n!)}{n!} \sim x\log(x)e^x$, and in that case if I approximate the sum to integral and can expand the integrand about $n=x$ with $e^{(x-n^2)/{4x}}$ then I'm done. But I cannot justify the steps.. $\endgroup$ – generic properties Dec 3 '15 at 3:53
8
+50
$\begingroup$

I will try to show the first asymptotics.

We begin with the following quantitative form of Stirling's formula:

Fact. For all $n \geq 0$, $$ \log (n!) = (n + \tfrac{1}{2})\log(n+1) - n + \mathcal{O}(1). \tag{1} $$

Now let $N_t$ be a Poisson random variable of rate $t$. Then

\begin{align*} \smash[b]{\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{t^n \log (n!)}{n!}e^{-t}} &= \Bbb{E}[\log (N_t !)] \\ &= \Bbb{E}[N_t \log (N_t) + \tfrac{1}{2}\log (N_t + 1) - N_t + \mathcal{O}(1)] \\ &= \Bbb{E}[N_t \log (N_t + 1)] + \tfrac{1}{2}\Bbb{E}[\log(N_t + 1)] - t + \mathcal{O}(1). \tag{2} \end{align*}

Now we claim the following:

Claim. For any $a \geq 0$ we have $$ t\log(t+a) \leq \Bbb{E}[N_t \log(N_t + a)] = t \Bbb{E}[\log(N_t + a + 1)] \leq t \log(t+ a + 1). \tag{3} $$ Here, we use the convention that $0 \log 0 = 0$.

Assuming this claim, we easily find that

$$ \Bbb{E}[N_t \log(N_t + 1)] = t \log t + \mathcal{O}(1) \quad \text{and} \quad \Bbb{E}[\log(N_t + 1)] = \log t + \mathcal{O}(t^{-1}). $$

Plugging this to $\text{(2)}$ gives

$$ \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{t^n \log (n!)}{n!}e^{-t} = (t + \tfrac{1}{2})\log t - t + \mathcal{O}(1) = \log (t!) + \mathcal{O}(1). $$

Dividing both sides by $t \log t$ yields the first asymptotics.

Proof of Claim. The last inequality of $\text{(3)}$ is easy to prove. Since the function $x \mapsto \log(x+a+1)$ is concave, by the Jensen's inequality we have

$$ \Bbb{E}[\log(N_t + a + 1)] \leq \log(\Bbb{E} N_t + a + 1) = \log(t+a+1). $$

In order to show the first inequality of $\text{(3)}$, notice that $x \mapsto x\log(x+a)$ is convex (with the 2nd derivative $(2a+x)/(a+x)^2 > 0$). Thus by the Jensen's inequality again

$$ \Bbb{E}[N_t \log (N_t + a)] \geq (\Bbb{E}N_t) \log (\Bbb{E}N_t + a) = t \log(t+a). $$

Finally, the middle equality of $\text{(3)}$ is given by

\begin{align*} \Bbb{E}[N_t \log (N_t + a)] &= \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} n \log(n+a) \cdot \frac{t^n}{n!}e^{-t} \\ &= \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \log(n+a+1) \cdot \frac{t^{n+1}}{n!}e^{-t} = t \Bbb{E}[\log (N_t + a + 1)]. \end{align*}

$\endgroup$
6
  • $\begingroup$ Looks good, but I fail to see why you need to introduce that the sum is a $\ldots$ of a Poisson process? You never seem to use that fact anywhere. $\endgroup$ – Winther Dec 9 '15 at 0:16
  • $\begingroup$ @Winther, You do not need a Poisson process. In fact, my first idea was to relate this to a Poisson process and then apply the law of large numbers. Then I discarded this approach without changing my notation. $\endgroup$ – Sangchul Lee Dec 9 '15 at 8:13
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks a lot for your answer. Do you have any suggestion for making the bound in the claim tighter? What could be done if I want to make the error term precise to the $O(x^{-1})$? $\endgroup$ – generic properties Dec 10 '15 at 16:51
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @Sangchul Lee, In fact, Ramanujan already attained the asymptotic form of $\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{x^n \log (n!)}{n!} e^{-x}$ (see entry 10 of Chapter 3 of his second notebook , by methods I don't actually understand well) precise to $O(x^{-2})$ and I wanted to generalize it to its variants $\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{x^{2n} \log ((2n)!)}{(2n)!} e^{-x}$ and I found your approach helps to the precision of $O(1)$, but it is still hard to show rigorously that the latter series is almost a half of the former. (Although I'm sure about that from numerical method) $\endgroup$ – generic properties Dec 11 '15 at 11:34
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @dielectric, I think it is in his first notebook. Anyway, I just skimmed over the proof, and it seems that the main idea is to utilize the concentration of the Poisson distribution to obtain the asymptotic expansion $$ \Bbb{E}[\varphi(N_t)] = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{\varphi^{(k)}(t)}{k!} \Bbb{E}[(N_t - t)^k]. $$ I guess that the proof can be modified to establish a analogous result for your case. $\endgroup$ – Sangchul Lee Dec 11 '15 at 22:12
2
$\begingroup$

Your idea is right that the entries near $n=x$ matter the most. In particular, the entries with $n=x+O(\sqrt{x})$ dominate this sum.

The following is not a complete answer, but I believe the holes can be filled in.

Suppose that $N=x + \alpha \sqrt{x},$ where $\alpha$ is fixed. Then, by Stirling's formula \begin{align*} \frac{\ln(N!)}{N!} x^N &= \left(1+O\left(\frac{1}{\ln x}\right)\right) \frac{(x+\alpha \sqrt{x}) \ln x}{\sqrt{2 \pi x} (x+\alpha \sqrt{x})^{x+\alpha \sqrt{x}}}e^{x+\alpha \sqrt{x}} x^{x+\alpha \sqrt{x}} \\ &=\left(1+O\left(\frac{1}{\ln x}\right)\right) x (\ln x) e^x \left[e^{\alpha \sqrt{x}} \left( \frac{x}{x+\alpha \sqrt{x}}\right)^{x+\alpha \sqrt{x}} \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi x}} \right]. \end{align*}

Now, note that \begin{align*} \left( \frac{x}{x+\alpha \sqrt{x}}\right)^{x+\alpha \sqrt{x}}&=\exp \left( -(x+\alpha \sqrt{x}) \cdot \ln\left(1+\frac{\alpha}{\sqrt{x}} \right)\right) \\&=\exp\left( -(x+\alpha \sqrt{x}) \left( \frac{\alpha}{\sqrt{x}} - \frac{\alpha^2}{2x} + O(n^{-3/2}) \right) \right) \\&= \exp \left( -\alpha \sqrt{x} - \alpha^2/2 + O(x^{-1/2}) \right). \end{align*}

Therefore $$ \frac{\ln N!}{N!}x^N = \left(1+O\left(\frac{1}{\ln x}\right)\right) [x \ln(x) e^x] \frac{e^{-\alpha^2/2}}{\sqrt{2\pi}} \frac{1}{\sqrt{x}} $$

Now the sum of these $e^{-\alpha^2/2}{\sqrt{2\pi}} \frac{1}{\sqrt{x}}$ over $N \in [x-C \sqrt{x}, x+C \sqrt{x}]$, $(C$ fixed w.r.t. $x$), is a Riemann sum for the integral $\int_{-C}^C \frac{e^{-t^2/2}}{\sqrt{2\pi}}dt$. This integral can be arbitrarily close to 1 for $C$ large enough.

It remains to be shown that for any $\epsilon >0$ (fixed w.r.t. $x$), $$ \sum_{n \notin [x-C \sqrt{x}, x+C \sqrt{x}]} \frac{\ln(N!)}{N!} x^N < \epsilon \, x \ (\ln x) \ e^x, $$ for $C$ large enough.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.