For the Sobolev-norm there holds $\Vert f\Vert_{W^{s,p}(\mathbb{R}^n)}\sim_{n,p,s}\left\Vert\left(\sum_{k\in\mathbb{N}_0}\left\vert (1+2^k)^sP_kf(x)\right\vert^2\right)^\frac{1}{2}\right\Vert_{L^p}$ with the Littlewood-Paley projections $P_kf$, which are defined as follows: Let $\phi$ and $\psi$ be a smooth and compactly supported functions such that the support of $\phi$ is included in a ball around the origin and the support of $\psi$ is in an annulus such that $1=\phi+\sum_{k\geq 1}\psi(2^{-k}\cdot)$. Then define $\widehat{P_0f}=\phi\hat f$ and $\widehat{P_kf}=\psi(2^{-k}\cdot)\hat f$.

The nonhomogeneous Besov norm ist defined by $\Vert f\Vert_{B^s_{p,r}}=\Vert (2^{ks}\Vert P_kf\Vert_{L^p})_{k\geq 0}\Vert_{\ell^r(\mathbb{N}_0)}$. The nonhomogeneous Besov space consists of all functions $f$ such that $\Vert f\Vert_{B^s_{p,r}}<\infty$. One can easily see that $\Vert f\Vert_{W^{s,2}}\sim\Vert f\Vert_{B^s_{2,2}}$. But how are $W^{s,p}$ and $B^s_{p,2}$ related if $p\neq 2$. Is there a way to show that $\Vert f\Vert_{W^{s,p}}\sim\Vert f\Vert_{B^s_{p,2}}$? It kinda looks like it but one has to interchange norms. Is that possible in this case?


1 Answer 1


$W^{s,p}$ is the inhomogeneous Triebel-Lizorkin space $F_{p,q}^{s}(\mathbb{R}^{n})$, with $q=2$, defined by


As you point out, one obtains the Besov space $B_{p,q}^{s}$ simply by interchanging the order in which norms are taken. I think you would agree that interchanging norms is, in general, a nontrivial action. It is clear from Minkowski's integral inequality that

$$\|f\|_{F_{p,q}^{s}}\leq\|f\|_{B_{p,q}^{s}} \enspace p\geq q, \quad\|f\|_{B_{p,q}^{s}}\leq\|f\|_{F_{p,q}^{s}} \enspace q\geq p$$

Additionally, by the nesting property of sequence spaces, $$\|f\|_{F_{p,q}^{s}}\leq\|f\|_{B_{p,r}^{s}} \enspace q\geq r, \quad \|f\|_{B_{p,r}^{s}}\leq\|f\|_{F_{p,q}^{s}} \enspace r\geq q$$

I believe that an equivalent characterization of $B_{p,q}^{s}$, for $0<s<1$, is in terms of the norm


If this is correct, then Besov spaces correspond to the generalized Lipschitz spaces $\Lambda_{\alpha}^{p,q}$ in E.M. Stein, Singular Integrals and Differentiability Properties of Functions, Chapter 5, where $s=\alpha$ in our notation. Furthermore, one can show using this characterization that $$W^{s,p}(\mathbb{R})\not\subset B_{p,q}^{s}(\mathbb{R}), \quad q<2 \tag{1}$$ and $$B_{p,q}^{s}(\mathbb{R})\not\subset W^{s,p}(\mathbb{R}), \quad q>2 \tag{2}$$

According to section 6.8 of the aforementioned reference, the function

$$f_{s,\sigma}(x):=e^{-\pi x^{2}}\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}a^{-ks}k^{-\sigma}e^{2\pi i a^{k}x}, \quad x\in\mathbb{R}$$

where $a>1$ is an integer, satisfy

$$f_{s,\sigma}\in W^{s,p}(\mathbb{R})\Leftrightarrow \sigma>\dfrac{1}{2},\quad \forall 1<p<\infty$$ and $$f_{s,\sigma}\in B_{p,q}^{s}(\mathbb{R})\Leftrightarrow \sigma>\dfrac{1}{q},\quad\forall 1<p<\infty$$

From this result, which I imagine depends on results for lacunary Fourier series, it is easy to deduce (1) and (2).


You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .