0
$\begingroup$

Basically, I have that $\ Y_i = \alpha +\beta(x_i-x_{bar}) + \epsilon_i $ where $\epsilon_i$ are i.i.d normally distributed with mean 0 variance $\sigma^2$ $\ Y_i ~~has ~a~normal~distribution~as ~follows~; N(\alpha + \beta(x_i-x_{bar}),\sigma^2 )$ Where the $\ x_i $ are just given numbers $\ \alpha^{hat}$ has distribution $\ N(\alpha,\sigma^2/n)$ AND $\beta^{hat}$ has a distribution $\ N(\beta,\sigma^2/\Sigma x_i^2)$

Let Z=AY where A an orthogonal matrix.

Show what $\Sigma (Y_i -\alpha_{hat} -\beta_{hat}(x_i))^2 ~~~{i=1...n} ~~~~= ~~\Sigma Z_i^2 ~~~~{i=3...n} $ and show then that $\Sigma Z_i^2 ~~~~{i=3...n} $ has a chi sqared distribution with n-2 degrees of freedom.

The thing is, I can do this up until the last part, what I dont understand is the degrees of freedom, I can see by showing this equation that $\Sigma Z_i^2 ~~~~{i=3...n} $ is a sum of squared standard normals, namely each of the terms $\ (Y_i -\alpha_{hat} -\beta_{hat}(x_i))^2$ are standard normals, but if the left = the right,. then isnt it the sum of n squared standard normals not n-2?!?!

Really confused by this.

Thanks

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

0
$\begingroup$

That would be the case if you had n independent normals with mean 0 and variance 1 squared. But these normals are not independent because of the common αhat and βhat being in the part subtracted for each Yi. The general rule is that the degrees of freedom - number of observations-number of parameters estimated in your case n observations minus 2 parameters estimated. That is where the n-2 comes from. In the case of a sample mean from n independent normals it is (Xi-Xbar)$^2$ that are summed S$^2$ = ∑(Xi-Xbar)$^2$/(n-1) satisfies (n-1)S$^2$/σ$^2$ is chi-square with n-1 degrees of freedom. Here there is just one parameter estimated, the mean.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ thanks for your reply, the thing Im not sure of though is we were told that it has chi squared distributionwith n-2 degrees of freedom because it was the sum of n-2 squares of standard normals, but where are these sums of squares of random normals?! $\endgroup$
    – Rosie
    Jun 6, 2012 at 20:14
  • $\begingroup$ When you take the sum of squares of n independent standard normals you get chi sqaure n degrees of freedom. But in this case you are taking sum of squares for n DEPENDENT standard normals with the dependence coming from the two estimated parameters that appear in the formula for each standard normal. $\endgroup$ Jun 6, 2012 at 20:40

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .