0
$\begingroup$

$\quad$ (Following, e.g. SBBM) Given a Lie algebra contraction $\mathfrak{g}\xrightarrow{t(\epsilon)}\mathfrak{g}_0$, one can contract a family $\{\rho_{\epsilon}:\mathfrak{g}\rightarrow gl(V_{\epsilon})\}$ of representations of $\mathfrak{g}$ (on some inner product spaces $V_{\epsilon}$) to a representation

$$ \rho_0:\mathfrak{g}_0\rightarrow gl\bigg(\underset{\longrightarrow}{\lim}V_{\epsilon}\bigg)$$

of $\mathfrak{g}_0$ on the direct limit of the $V_{\epsilon}$ by setting

$$ \rho_0(\tilde{X}_j)[v] := \lim_{\epsilon\rightarrow 0^+}[\rho_{\epsilon}(t(\epsilon)(X_j))\varphi_{\epsilon'\epsilon}(v)], $$

where $\{X_j\}$ are the generators for $\mathfrak{g}$, $\{\tilde{X}_j\}$ are the (contracted) generators of $\mathfrak{g}_0$, $\varphi_{\epsilon'\epsilon}:V_{\epsilon'}\rightarrow V_{\epsilon}$ are the transition maps from the definition of the direct limit, and where we have chosen a representative $v\in V_{\epsilon'}$ for $[v]\in \displaystyle\underset{\longrightarrow}{\lim}V_{\epsilon}=\sqcup_{\epsilon}V_{\epsilon}/\sim$ (and $\sim$ is the natural equivalence relation for taking direct limits of inner product spaces -- more details on all of these pieces can, of course, be added, if needed). This representation $\rho_0$ is called the contraction of the representations $\{\rho_{\epsilon}\}$ (which is consistent with, for example, the notion of contraction of representations given in the classic Inonu-Wigner paper on contractions).

Question: Can this procedure be extended to the universal enveloping algebras, i.e. does the contraction $t(\epsilon)$ yield a contraction $\mathfrak{U(g)}\xrightarrow{\tilde{t}(\epsilon)}\mathfrak{U(g}_0)$ (and then, of course, to representations of $\mathfrak{U(g)}$ and $\mathfrak{U(g}_0)$)?

This isn't immediately obvious to me, and I cannot seem to find any references that discuss this.

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

There is no difference between $U(\mathfrak{g})$-modules and $\mathfrak{g}$-modules, because they can be identified. Hence it does not matter concerning contractions. But contractions can be defined for any finite-dimensional algebra and its representations. However, the universal enveloping algebra is infinite-dimensional, which is perhaps not in the sense of Inonü-Wigner contractions. For a survey on contractions of algebras, algebraic groups etc. see here.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Ah, that's a good point. I was really just interested in the contraction of representations of the UEAs, but it might be interesting to see if the I-W contraction (or, slightly more generally, Weimer-Woods) can be extended in any meaningful way to the infinite-dimensional case. Thanks! $\endgroup$ – ChickenSocks Dec 24 '15 at 2:46

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.