As a definition, I was told that for a surface in 3D,

$ 2H = -\nabla \cdot \nu$

where $H$ is the mean curvature and $\nu$ is the normal unit vector. In some results that I am studying, the factor 2 always disappears... Is this normal ? can we ignore the factor 2 and consider the definition "up to a constant" ?



$$H = -\nabla \cdot \nu, \ \ \ H =-\frac{1}{2} \nabla \cdot \nu$$

are used in the literature. The former is more convenient (don't need to remind ourselves that there is a two) while the latter has the advantage that $H=1$ when the surface is the unit sphere. Just pick one and be careful.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.