In the 2D case he has $A=[1,1;1,2;1,3]$. In the lecture he talks about how A is a subspace in our n dimesional (in this case n=2) space.
If you look at the top left point of the chalk board in that time stamp you will see he has written down $A=[a_{1},a_{2}]$. Here he was talking about the 3d case, and the $a$s were vectors that spanned a plane onto which we wanted to project.
My problem is, I'm not quite sure how I'm supposed to understand the values for the 2D. Clearly the 2nd column is the x values, but can one say they span a space? The first one is obviously just the constant for our linear equation but how could one interpret that in the context of A spanning the subspace of our 2D world?
Basically I find there's a contradiction between how he views 2D and how he looks at higher dimensions. I don't see how it makes sense for A to be made out of two vectors as columns in 3D and for A to be made out of 2 different columns in 2D.