Let $f'(u_1)<0$ and $c>0$. Consider the matrix $$ \begin{pmatrix}0 & 1 & 0\\-f'(u_1) & -c & 1\\0 & 0 & 0\end{pmatrix}. $$ Its eigenvalues are $$ \lambda_1=0,~~~~~\lambda_2=-\frac{c}{2}+\sqrt{\frac{c^2}{4}-f'(u_1)},~~~~~\lambda_3=-\frac{c}{2}-\sqrt{\frac{c^2}{4}-f'(u_1)}. $$

The eigenvector $\Lambda_1$ that belongs to the eigenvalue $\lambda_1$ is given by $$ \Lambda_1=(-1,0,-f'(u_1)). $$ Now I am searching the eigenvectors $\Lambda_2$ (belonging to $\lambda_2$) and $\Lambda_3$ (belonging to $\lambda_3$). Unfortunately, I was not successfull in finding them.


In the general case, $\lambda_2$ and $\lambda_3$ are both nonzero. When $\lambda$ is one of them you know that $$ \left|\begin{matrix}-\lambda & 1 & 0 \\ -f'(u_1) & -c-\lambda & 1 \\ 0 & 0 & -\lambda \end{matrix}\right| = -\lambda \left|\begin{matrix}-\lambda & 1 \\ -f'(u_1) & -c-\lambda \end{matrix} \right| = 0 $$

so the rows of the $2\times 2$ matrix are linearly dependent and if we find a vector that maps to something with $0$ in the first component it will also map to something with $0$ in the second component.

Thus, an eigenvector corresponding to $\lambda_i$ will be $(1,\lambda_i,0)$.

In the cases where one of $\lambda_2$ and $\lambda_3$ is zero, the above reasoning doesn't work, so in principle you'll have to handle those specially. Fortunately, this only happens if $-f'(u_1)=0$, in which case a special-case analysis should be simple to conduct.

Another special case is when $\lambda_2=\lambda_3$, in which case a further analysis is necessary find out whether its eigenspace has dimension one or two.

| cite | improve this answer | |
  • $\begingroup$ So the eigenvector $\Lambda_2$ belonging to $\lambda_2$ is $\Lambda_2=(1,-c-\lambda_3,0)$ and, similarly, the eigenvector $\Lambda_3$ belonging to $\lambda_3$ is given by $\Lambda_3=(1,-c-\lambda_2,0)$? $\endgroup$ – M. Meyer Nov 19 '15 at 10:12
  • $\begingroup$ @M.Meyer: I had a bit of a braino there, confusing the column space of $A-\lambda I$ with its null space. Answer updated and hopefully it works better now. $\endgroup$ – hmakholm left over Monica Nov 19 '15 at 10:56

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.