Let $X=\mathbb{R}\setminus \mathbb{Q}$. Is $X\times X$ path-connected?

I don't know where to start I think we need some number theory knowledge.

  • $\begingroup$ I don't believe it's path connected. If you just think about just $X = \mathbb{R} \backslash \mathbb{Q}$, there are gaps at all the rationals, so there conceivably could be points that are not connected by a continuous path since $\mathbb{Q}$ is dense in $\mathbb{R}$. Of course, this is not rigorous but it should give some intuition behind the answer. $\endgroup$ – Kevin Sheng Nov 19 '15 at 5:12
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @B.Pasternak $X\times X$ is not the same as that space. If you remove rational pairs from $\mathbb R^2$ you are still left with points that have a single rational coordinate. $\endgroup$ – John Douma Nov 19 '15 at 5:19
  • $\begingroup$ This space is disconnected because all rational coordinates have been removed. The two open half planes separated by the $y$ axis are also closed in this space. Therefore, the space is not even connected so it cannot be path connected. $\endgroup$ – John Douma Nov 19 '15 at 5:21
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Kevin: If $X \times X$ is path connected, pick a path from $(x,y)$ to $(x',y)$. Project onto the first coordinate. You now have a path from $x$ to $x'$. $\endgroup$ – user98602 Nov 19 '15 at 5:24
  • $\begingroup$ @JohnDouma I misread, and you are right. $\endgroup$ – B. Pasternak Nov 19 '15 at 5:32

This space is not the same as $\mathbb R^2$ \ $\mathbb Q^2$.

$\mathbb R^2$ \ $\mathbb Q^2$ is path connected and if you search this site you will find a couple of nice proofs of that fact.

In this space, we remove the rational numbers before taking the product. Consider the partition of $X\times X$ into two half planes: $\{(x,y): x\lt 0\}$ and $\{(x,y): x\gt 0\}$. Each of these sets is open and since they partition the space, they are each the complement of an open set so they are also closed.

Therefore, $X\times X$ is disconnected and so it cannot be path connected.

  • $\begingroup$ Just to clarify, the key point here is that 0 was rational, right? We could have chosen this "separation" around any rational point. $\endgroup$ – user41728 Nov 19 '15 at 8:20
  • $\begingroup$ @user41728 Yes. That is correct. $\endgroup$ – John Douma Nov 19 '15 at 13:30

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.