I'm trying to prove that if ${a_n}$ is convergent, and ${b_n}$ is divergent, then ${a_n} + {b_n}$ is a divergent series.

A proof a friend told, but I don't understand how can be correct is:

Assume ${a_n} + {b_n}$ convereges.

Therefore, $\lim_{n\to{\infty}}({a_n} + {b_n}) = \lim_{n\to{\infty}}({a_n}) + \lim_{n\to{\infty}}({b_n}) $

Contradiction, since ${b_n}$ doesn't converge to a limit.

Why can limit arithmetic rules be used in this case? since ${b_n}$ is not a convergent series, I didn't think you can use it to express a convergent sequence's limit, and show "as if" ${b_n}$ has a limit and contradict the assumption using it.


  • 1
    $\begingroup$ use $b_n=(a_n+b_n)-a_n$ $\endgroup$
    – R.N
    Nov 17, 2015 at 22:10

1 Answer 1


Rearrange the calculation so that you’re working with convergent sequences. Assume that $\lim\limits_{n\to\infty}(a_n+b_n)=L$ and $\lim\limits_{n\to\infty}a_n=M$; then


contradicting the assumption that $\langle b_n:n\in\Bbb N\rangle$ is divergent.

  • $\begingroup$ It feels to me that saying "lim bn" is making a mistake in the first place, since bn is divergent. it's like doing some math error (like dividing by 0) and showing that 2 = 1. Why is it ok doing this? $\endgroup$
    – Taru
    Nov 17, 2015 at 22:37
  • $\begingroup$ @Taru: It’s okay because if the $a_n$ and $a_n+b_n$ sequences are convergent, which is what we’re assuming, then the displayed calculation is necessarily correct. Since the result of that calculation contradicts the assumptions, it follows that the $a_n$ and $a_n+b_n$ sequences cannot both be convergent. We know that one of them is, so we are forced to conclude that the other isn’t. $\endgroup$ Nov 17, 2015 at 22:39
  • $\begingroup$ I think I got it. Thanks! $\endgroup$
    – Taru
    Nov 17, 2015 at 22:48
  • $\begingroup$ @Taru: You’re welcome! $\endgroup$ Nov 17, 2015 at 22:50

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .