Consider $X_1,X_2,...,X_n$ the i.i.d. Bernoulli random variables, with $P(X_i = 1) = p$ and $P(X_i = 0) = q$. Take the process $S=(S_n)_{n\geq 0}$ where $S_n= X_1 +...+ X_n$ for $n = 1,2,\dots$ and $S_0= 0$: For which $p$ is $(S_n)$ a martingale? sub martingale? super martingale?

Basically I let $F_n=\sigma(X_1,...,X_n)$ be the filtration $F$ at $n$. To find $p$ such that $X_1,..,X_n$ is a sub martingale/martingale I found

$E(S_{n+1}|F_n)\leq S_n \implies E(X_{n+1}|F_n)+E(S_n|F_n)\leq S_n \implies E(X_{n+1})+S_n\leq S_n \implies p\leq 0 $. Thus $p=0$. Similarly when $p\geq 0$ then $X_1,...,X_n$ is a super martingale

The result seems trivial, but I am not sure if this correct. Thanks

  • $\begingroup$ Most likely your Bernoulli variable has support $\{-1,1\}$ instead. $\endgroup$ – A.S. Nov 16 '15 at 22:07
  • $\begingroup$ The support is $\{0,1\}$. I think its pretty much in all cases of a random variable follows a Bernoulli distribution. $\endgroup$ – user60887 Nov 16 '15 at 22:49

Yes, it is correct. So the sequence $(S_n)$ is never a martingale unless in degenerated cases. We could note that the conclusion would not be the same if we replaced $P(X_i = 0) = q$ by $P(X_i = -1) = q$.

| cite | improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.