5
$\begingroup$

I'm currently studying Calculus from Stewart's book, and for the The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Pt. 1, he defined a function $g(x) = \int_0^x f(t) dt$ which represented the area under $f(x)$ from $0$ up to $x$ and proved that $g(x)$ is the antiderivative of $f(x)$ and, in this case, if I plugged in an $x$ for $g(x)$, it would give me the area under the curve from $0$ til that $x$ since $g(x) = \int_0^x f(t) dt$

However, for an arbitrary function $f(x)$, if I found the antiderivative and plugged in an $x$, it would give me the area under the curve of $f(x)$ from which point upto $x$?

|cite|improve this question
$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

It depends on your choice of antiderivative.

In what you write, $g(x)$ is an antiderivative of $f(x)$. Indeed, any function of the form $g(x)+c$, where $c$ is a constant would still be an antiderivative for $f$.

Your $g(x)$ is that one antiderivative that satisfies the relation $g(0)=0$. There are infinitely many choices you can make, but once you require an antiderivative $h(x)$ to satisfy $h(x)=c'$, where $c'$ is a constant, you get a unique function.

Also, from this you know that $h(x)=g(x)+c'$. So, a priori, the antiderivative evaluated at a point $x_0$ does not have a natural interpretation as an area.

I think I am having troubles explaining myself on this, so if you any question that could help me clarify this to you, please ask.

|cite|improve this answer
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Your answer would be much more helpful to OP if you could add a diagram to illustrate your point. $\endgroup$ – User2956 Nov 15 '15 at 3:40
  • $\begingroup$ @Pulzz I don't know what you mean by "diagram" in this context. $\endgroup$ – Silvia Ghinassi Nov 15 '15 at 3:48
  • $\begingroup$ I was thinking maybe a diagram(s) showing different anti-derivatives of a function that differ by a constant and the area under the f(x) curve that each of them represent. $\endgroup$ – User2956 Nov 15 '15 at 4:38
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ But that would be misleading; as I said one should not think of antiderivatives as areas. $\endgroup$ – Silvia Ghinassi Nov 15 '15 at 16:10
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, but an antiderivative + C gives a unique function that represents the area. And showing antiderivatives with different constants and the area they represent might help $\endgroup$ – User2956 Nov 16 '15 at 17:47

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.