3
$\begingroup$

Suppose that we reside in the set of all concave polygons (that is, polygons which are non-convex and simple, simple means that the boundary of the polygon does not cross itself).

Let us denote that set as $C$

The question is:

Does there exist $n_0 \in \mathbb N \setminus \{1,2\}$ and some concave polygon $p \in C$ such that $p$ can be tiled with $n_0$ congruent connected parts which are not polygons?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ It might help our understanding of your question if you told us why you have excluded $n_0 = 2$. $\endgroup$ – Rob Arthan Nov 13 '15 at 23:21
  • $\begingroup$ @RobArthan Hey Rob, it is because I have some vague feeling that it maybe could be done for $n_0=2$, but maybe I am wrong. $\endgroup$ – Farewell Nov 13 '15 at 23:25
  • $\begingroup$ Do you require polygons to have straight line segments for their edges? $\endgroup$ – Rob Arthan Nov 13 '15 at 23:27
  • $\begingroup$ @RobArthan Yes. $\endgroup$ – Farewell Nov 13 '15 at 23:28
  • $\begingroup$ And a finite number of them, of course. $\endgroup$ – Farewell Nov 13 '15 at 23:31
1
$\begingroup$

Take a regular $n$-gon with centre $O$ and vertices $V_1, \ldots, V_n$ and draw a curvilinear arc $R_1$ from $O$ to $V_1$ that lies in the interior of $\triangle O V_1 V_2$. Now rotate $R_1$ through $2\pi k/n$ for $k = 1, 2, \ldots n - 1$, giving arcs $R_2, \ldots R_n$. This gives you $n$ congruent "curvilinear triangles" that tile the $n$-gon.

This image of a camera iris gives the idea much better than the above words.

To exhibit a similar tiling for a non-convex polygon, carry out the above construction for the polygon comprising the union of two regular $n$-gons with $n > 4$ that have a common edge (like two adjacent cells in a honeycomb). The boundary of the union is a non-convex simple polygon that can be tiled by the congruent non-polygons described above,

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ But those triangles overlap in a sense that they all have centre $C$ as they common point, and tiling is by definition composed of non-overlapping pieces, is it? $\endgroup$ – Farewell Nov 13 '15 at 23:46
  • $\begingroup$ No. The definition of a tiling requires that the tiles only intersect on their boundaries (see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tessellation). $\endgroup$ – Rob Arthan Nov 13 '15 at 23:51
  • $\begingroup$ Okay, but still regular n-gon is convex and the question is about concave polygons? $\endgroup$ – Farewell Nov 13 '15 at 23:53
  • $\begingroup$ See the revised answer. $\endgroup$ – Rob Arthan Nov 13 '15 at 23:59
  • $\begingroup$ If we take a non-convex polygon which is union of two regular n-gons that share an edge, then is that non-convex polygon simple? It seems to me that it is not because it has a boundary that crosses itself? $\endgroup$ – Farewell Nov 14 '15 at 0:06

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.