3
$\begingroup$

The usual definition for a sequence $u_k $ converge weakly to $u$ in $W^{1,p} (U)$ is that $ u_k \rightharpoonup u$ in $L^p (U)$ and ${u_k}_ {x_i } \rightharpoonup u_{x_i }$ in $L^p (U)$ for all $i$.

But if I think $W^{1,p } (U)$ itself as a Banach space, weak convergence means for any bounded linear operator $f$ on it, $f(u_k ) \to f(u)$.

Are the two definitions equivalent? It's easy to get the first one from the second, but I have trouble seeing how the inverse hold.

Any help is appreciated. Many thanks in advance.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Just note that $W^{1,p}\to L^p, f\mapsto \partial_i f $ is linear and continuous and that continuous linear maps map weakly convergent sequences to weakly convergent sequences. $\endgroup$ – PhoemueX Nov 13 '15 at 18:26
  • $\begingroup$ @PhoemueX I guess this is the direction I know. How about the other direction? $\endgroup$ – MathStarter Nov 13 '15 at 21:38
2
$\begingroup$

Any linear functional $f$ on $W^{1,p}(U)$, $1 \le p < \infty$ can be identified with $(v_0,\ldots,v_n) \in L^{q}(U)^{n+1}$, $1/q + 1/p = 1$, via $$f(u) = \int_U u \, v_0 + \sum_{i=1}^n u_{x_i} \, v_i \, \mathrm{d}x.$$ This shows the equivalency of your conditions.

And this identification can be shown by using $T : W^{1,p}(U) \to L^p(U)^{n+1}$, $$u \mapsto (u, u_{x_1}, \ldots, u_{x_n}).$$ This $T$ is isometric (if the norms are defined accordingly). Hence, a bounded, linear functional $f$ on $W^{1,p}(U)$ can be identified with bounded functional on a closed subspace of $L^p(U)^{n+1}$. Now, extend it by Hahn-Banach and identify with an element from $L^q(U)^{n+1}$.

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

A complete answer was already given. In this post I will consider the case $1<p<\infty$ (in which case we can exploit the reflexivity and get a stronger result).

Let $X$ be a normed space over $\mathbb K$, $X'$ the dual of $X$, $(x_k)$ a sequence in $X$ and $x\in X$.

Definition. We say that $(x_k)$ converges weakly to $x$ in $X$ if $$f(x_k)\to f(x)\quad\text{in}\quad\mathbb K,\quad \quad\forall \ f\in X'.$$

Notation: If $(x_k)$ converges weakly to $x$ in $X$, we write $$u_k\rightharpoonup u\quad\text{in}\quad X.$$

Theorem. Let $1<p<\infty$, $(u_k)\subset W^{1,p}(\Omega)$ and $u\in W^{1,p}(\Omega)$. The following assertions are equivalent.
(a) $u_k\rightharpoonup u$ in $W^{1,p}(\Omega)$.
(b) $u_k\rightharpoonup u$ in $L^p(\Omega)$ and ${u_k}_{x_i}\rightharpoonup u_{x_i}$ in $L^p(\Omega)$ for all $i=1,...,n$.
(c) $u_k\rightharpoonup u$ in $L^p(\Omega)$ and $({u_k}_{x_i})$ is weakly convergent in $L^p(\Omega)$ for all $i=1,...,n$.
(d) $u_k\rightharpoonup u$ in $L^p(\Omega)$ and $(\nabla {u_k})$ is bounded in $[L^p(\Omega)]^n$.

Proof.

$\mathbf{(a)\Rightarrow(b)}$. For $i=1,...,n$, define $f_i:W^{1,p}(\Omega)\to L^p(\Omega)$ by $f_i(v)=v_{x_i}$. Note that each $f_i$ is continuous because $$\|f_i(v)\|_{L^p}^p=\|v_{x_i}\|_{L^p}^p\leq \|v\|_{L^p}^p+\sum_{i=1}^n\left\|v_{x_i}\right\|_{L^p}^p=\|v\|_{W^{1,p}}^p$$ As continuous linear operators preserve weak convergence, $${u_k}_{x_i}=f_i(u_k)\ \rightharpoonup f_i(u)=u_{x_i}\quad\text{in}\quad L^p(\Omega),\qquad\forall \ i=1,...,n.$$ Analogously, $f_0:W^{1,p}(\Omega)\to L^p(\Omega)$ given by $f_0(v)=v$ is continuous and thus we also have $$u_k=f_0(u_k)\ \rightharpoonup f_0(u)=u\quad\text{in}\quad L^p(\Omega).$$

$\mathbf{(b)\Rightarrow(c)}$. Trivial.

$\mathbf{(c)\Rightarrow(d)}$. Every weakly convergent sequence is norm bounded. Thus, $({u_k}_{x_1}), ..., ({u_k}_{x_n})$ are all bounded in $L^p(\Omega)$.

$\mathbf{(d)\Rightarrow(a)}$.

As $(u_k)$, $({u_k}_{x_1}), ..., ({u_k}_{x_n})$ are bounded in $L^p(\Omega)$, we conclude that $(u_k)$ is bounded in $W^{1,p}(\Omega)$. Let $(u_{k_m})$ be a subsequence of $(u_k)$. Since $W^{1,p}(\Omega)$ is reflexive, there exist a subsequence $(u_{k_{m'}})$ of $(u_{k_m})$ and a function $w\in W^{1,p}(\Omega)$ such that $$u_{k_{m'}}\rightharpoonup w\quad\text{in}\quad W^{1,p}(\Omega).$$ It follows from the implication $\text{(a)}\Rightarrow\text{(b)}$ that $$u_{k_{m'}}\rightharpoonup w\quad\text{in}\quad L^p(\Omega).$$ It follows from the uniqueness of the weak limit that $w=u$. In short: every subsequence of $(u_k)$ has a subsequence which converges to $u$. This implies that the entire sequence converges weakly to $u$. $\square$

Source: Le Dret (Proposition 1.8, p. 16).

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.