3
$\begingroup$

$y(n) = x(-n)$ , causal or not , memory or memory-less ?

it's a question in digital signal processing course .

My guess it's memory less , causal because $x(-n)$ is only the inverse of the function ?

Memoryless System A system is memoryless if the output y[n] at every value of n depends only on the input x[n] at the same value of n

Causality A system is causal it’s output is a function of only the current and previous samples

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ It helps (you and the others) that the problem statement has a subject and a predicate. Eg: Is the filter/system defined by the relation $y[n]=x[-n]$ causal or not... ? ($x[n]$ is the input and $y[n]$ the output? Do you know the definition of a memory-less filter? What is the output at time, say $n=5$? $\endgroup$ – leonbloy Jun 1 '12 at 23:39
  • $\begingroup$ I got it in the sheet like , tell whether the system is memory or memory less, causal or non $\endgroup$ – xsari3x Jun 1 '12 at 23:56
  • $\begingroup$ well, a system is memoriles if output y[n] for every value of n (say, for n=5, y[5]) depends only of the input at the same instant (x[5]) But y[5] does depend rather on x[-5], so... $\endgroup$ – leonbloy Jun 2 '12 at 1:02
4
$\begingroup$
  • It is not causal. Consider $n=-1$. The output $y(-1)$ depends on the input at $n=1$, which is only available in future.
  • It is not memoryless. Consider any $n > 0$. The output $y$ depends on the input at $-n$ which was applied in the past. Thus the system has memory.
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.