0
$\begingroup$

I've worked through a computation-heavy, "standard" but quite nonrigorous treatment of multivariable calculus in the past. What book would do well as a rigorous (but not overly) "second course"? In particular, I'm looking for a book that

  • treats differential forms

  • treats the inverse and implicit function theorems

and leads well into an intro manifolds book like Tu's one. (Bonus points if it actually talks a bit about manifolds itself or works with differential forms defined on manifolds instead of only $\Bbb R^n$!)

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Zorich's Mathematical Analys (vol. I & II) perhaps? $\endgroup$ – Hans Lundmark Nov 12 '15 at 5:47
  • $\begingroup$ I do not think I want an analysis book. I'd like something with plenty of pictures and one that does not spend a lot of time with epsilon-delta arguments. (My idea of analysis books is that they don't do that kind of thing; I may be wrong.) $\endgroup$ – Soham Chowdhury Nov 12 '15 at 5:51
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Fine, it was just a suggestion. But what do you mean by "treating" the inverse and implicit function theorems then? I got the impression that you already know how to use them, and were looking for a more advanced book where you could see how they actually are proved. $\endgroup$ – Hans Lundmark Nov 12 '15 at 7:06
  • $\begingroup$ No, I do not know those two theorems. I only know that they are something that I should know before studying manifolds. $\endgroup$ – Soham Chowdhury Nov 12 '15 at 10:52
  • $\begingroup$ I see. Yes, in that case, some other book is probably more suitable. $\endgroup$ – Hans Lundmark Nov 12 '15 at 11:05
1
$\begingroup$

Possible recommendations - I'm not 100% sure if what you are looking for exists but these are all well-written and worth investigating.

  • Edwards, Advanced calculus: a differential forms approach
  • Bloch, A First Course in Geometric Topology and Differential Geometry
  • Bachmann, A Geometric Approach to Differential Forms

The last one is particularly nice, in my opinion.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Bachmann doesn't do the implicit function theorem, I suppose. :( $\endgroup$ – Soham Chowdhury Nov 12 '15 at 5:25
  • $\begingroup$ Yeah, I wasn't sure - it might be in the "Prerequisites" section. $\endgroup$ – kcrisman Nov 12 '15 at 13:31

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.