Define $( \mathbb R^n, m) $ as a metric space such that $ m=\max \{ | x_i - y_i |: i=1...n \} .$

And also $(\mathbb R^2, d) $ as another metric space such that $d= \sum_{i=0}^n | x_i - y_i | .$

Question asks: are these metrics equivalent?

I know l should show the equivalent of induced topologies or $\tau_m $ = $ \tau_d $.

So l should pick an open ball from $ \tau_m$ and show that this open ball is open in $\tau_d $. But doesn't look like these basis balls are equivalent, as one of them is in $\mathbb R^2$ and the other is in $\mathbb R^n$ . Could you please evaluate my approach?

The second question is , what if l change the second metric to ( $\mathbb R^n$, d)?

Then $\mathcal B_\epsilon ^m (x) $ should be open in $\tau_d $.

In this case, what can l do to show these basis balls are open in both topologies?

  • $\begingroup$ I cannot understand your second question: To which metric is $d$ changed? $\endgroup$ – Stephan Kulla Nov 9 '15 at 0:25
  • $\begingroup$ @tampis d is charged to ($\mathbb R^n $, d) $\endgroup$ – user288280 Nov 9 '15 at 0:43
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ One way to show equivalence of metrics $d1,d2$: For a point $p$ and $\{i,j\}=\{1,2\}$ and $r>0$ show there exists $s>0$ such that $B_{dj}(p,s)\subset B_{di}(p,r)$. $\endgroup$ – DanielWainfleet Nov 9 '15 at 0:45
  • $\begingroup$ @user288280 What is the definition of $d$ in the second question? From the word "change" I deduce that it is not the metric $d$ defined in your first sentence... $\endgroup$ – Stephan Kulla Nov 9 '15 at 0:49
  • $\begingroup$ @tampis l just edited the second question ... sorry for that $\endgroup$ – user288280 Nov 9 '15 at 0:52

For the first question: $(\mathbb R^n, m)$ and $(\mathbb R^2, d)$ are only be equivalent metric spaces iff $n=2$ because the underlying vector space need to be the same. For $n=2$ see the following paragraph...

For the second question: Your metrics are defined by p-norms and because your vector space is real-valued and finite the metrics are equivalent. See Any two norms equivalent on a finite dimensional norm linear space. why this is the case.

  • $\begingroup$ Thanks. .. is there any other way to show it by open balls on both metric spaces for second question? I mean not using the p - norms $\endgroup$ – user288280 Nov 9 '15 at 1:02
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, but I would recommend to show that the underlying norms are equivalent... $\endgroup$ – Stephan Kulla Nov 9 '15 at 1:06

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.