$C(K)$ is reflexive if and only if $K$ is finite Let $C(K)$ be the set of all continuous complex valued functions on a compact Hausdorff space $K$. Is it true that $K$ must be finite if $C(K)$ is reflexive?
To me it seems true, but I don't know how to prove it. As $C(K)$ is reflexive then we have canonical isometry onto $C(K)^{**}$. How does that help?
 A: The dual space of $C(K)$ is the space of Radon measure $\nu$ on $K$. For every bounded Borel function $u$ on $K$, one can define $\bar u \in C(K)^{**}$ by 
$$\bar u (\nu) = \int_K u d\nu,\ \ \ \ \forall \nu \in C(K)^*. $$
Note that the canonical embedding $\Phi: C(K) \to C(K)^{**}$ is given by 
$$\Phi f(\nu) = \nu(f) = \int_K fd\nu,$$
thus if $\Phi$ is surjective, for all bounded Borel measurable $u$ there is $f\in C(K)$ so that 
$$\bar u = \Phi f \Rightarrow \int_K u d\nu = \int_K f d\nu$$
for all Radon measure $\nu$. In particular for the Dirac measure $\nu = \delta_x$, $x\in K$, we have 
$$u(x) = f(x).$$
Thus all bounded Borel measurable functions are indeed continuous. In particular, all one point sets are open and so $K$ is discrete. By compactness, $K$ is finite. 
A: One simple case is when K is a metric space. Since it is compact, it is separable. Choose a dense set $\{y_n\} $ of K, them the functions $x \mapsto d (x,y_n) $ generate a separable subalgebra of C(K) that is dense by Stone weierstrass. Hence C(K) is separable.
However, for each $x\in K $, the evaluation maps $ev_x $ are bounded linear functionals at a distance 1 from each other. Thus if K is infinite, then $C(K)^{\ast} $ is not separable, and so C(K) cannot be reflexive.
OTOH, if K is finite, the  C(K) is finite dimensional and hence reflexive.
A: There is another different answer to you question in the special case that you allow $C(K)$ for $K = \mathbb T$, the torus, to be equipped with the weak topology.
The following is taken from the article Exact Support Recovery for Sparse Spikes Deconvolution by
Vincent Duval and Gabriel Peyré, from subsection 2.1 Topology of Radon Measures:
$M(\mathbb T)$ can be defined as the dual space of $C(\mathbb T)$ endowed with the uniform norm $\| \cdot \|_{\infty}$. It is naturally a Banach space when endowed  with the dual norm (also called total variation norm)
$$
\| m \|_{\text{TV}}
:= \sup_{\substack{f \in C(\mathbb T) \\ \| f \|_{\infty} = 1}} \int_{\mathbb T} f dm.
$$
In that case the dual of $M(\mathbb T)$ is a complicated space, and it is strictly larger than $C(\mathbb T)$, as $C(\mathbb T)$ is not reflexive.
However, if we endow $M(\mathbb T)$ with its weak$^*$ topology (i.e. the coarsest topology such that elements of $C(\mathbb T)$ defined continuous linear functionals on $M(\mathbb T)$), then $M(\mathbb T)$ is a locally convex space whose dual is $C(\mathbb T)$.
Thus if we endow $C(\mathbb T)$ with its weak and $M(\mathbb T)$ with its weak$^*$-topology, both have symmetrical roles, on is the dual of the other, and conversely.
