Given (differentiable) functions $\,n_{1,2}:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}\,$ we write vector $\renewcommand{\arraystretch}{2}$

\begin{align} \vec{\boldsymbol{n}} = \begin{bmatrix} n_{1} \\ n_{2} \end{bmatrix} \end{align}

and define "gradient of a vector" operation $\,:\mathbb{R}^2\to\mathbb{R}^{2\times2}\,$ as

\begin{align}\label{1}\tag{$\boldsymbol{\ast}$} \begin{bmatrix} \,^{\partial}/_{\partial x}\, \\ \,^{\partial}/_{\partial y}\, \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix}\,n_{1} & n_{2} \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix}\, \big(n_{1}\big)_{x} & \big(n_{2}\big)_{x} \\\, \big(n_{1}\big)_{y} & \big(n_{2}\big)_{y} \end{bmatrix}. \end{align}

Is it possible to write the expression above in terms of nabla operator and vector $\,\vec{\boldsymbol{n}}$? For example, I was thinking about something like

\begin{align} \begin{bmatrix}\, \big(n_{1}\big)_{x} & \big(n_{2}\big)_{x} \\\, \big(n_{1}\big)_{y} & \big(n_{2}\big)_{y} \end{bmatrix} = \nabla \circ \vec{\boldsymbol{n}}^{T} \end{align}

where $\,\circ\,$ stands for some (vector calculus?) operation.

What would be an appropriate symbol to write instead of $\,\circ\,$? Is there standard notation for such operation?

I know that the matrix on the right hand side of equation $\eqref{1}$ can be viewed as Jacobian matrix of vector-valued function $\,\vec{\boldsymbol{n}}\,(x,y):\mathbb{R}^{2}\to\mathbb{R}^{2},\,$ but I would like to be able to express in using just the vector $\,\vec{\boldsymbol{n}}\,$ and differential operations of vector calculus.


Yes, there exist actually a standard notation for that. If you look up into a tensor calculus book and read a little about the Tensor Product or Dyadic Product or sometimes called the outer product of vectors, $ \otimes $, you will find what you want. Usually, it is written in this way

$\nabla \otimes {\bf{n}} \equiv \nabla {\bf{n}}$

where the second one is mostly used for abbreviation! This link may help you a little. Also, see this one. This book by Itskov is a good one if you want to see the theory and application at the same time. Also, if you are some rigorous mathematician you can take this book by Marsden.

  • $\begingroup$ Did you mean to write $\,\nabla\otimes{\bf{n}} \equiv \nabla {\bf{n}}^{T}$? $\endgroup$ – Vlad Nov 1 '15 at 12:15
  • $\begingroup$ @Vlad: It depends on the basic definitions! Both can be true! :) I have seen both them in several books. $\endgroup$ – H. R. Nov 1 '15 at 12:16
  • $\begingroup$ Oh I see. Thank you! Could you also give a link to a tensor calculus book, or list its authors and title of relevant book you would recommend? $\endgroup$ – Vlad Nov 1 '15 at 12:19
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Vlad: Are you there? :D $\endgroup$ – H. R. Nov 1 '15 at 12:32
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Vlad: Your answer is ${\bf{H}} = \nabla \otimes \nabla \otimes {\bf{n}} \equiv \nabla \nabla {\bf{n}}$. :) $\endgroup$ – H. R. Nov 1 '15 at 17:24

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.