3
$\begingroup$

What is the relationship between the improper Riemann-integral and Lebesgue integrability?

There's a very sloppy section of it in my book with about 4-5 known mistakes found so far, so I fear I have a completely wrong idea of what's what now.

My question is, what must be true for some $u$ and its improper Riemann-integral for it to be Lebesgue-integrable, and what must be true for the Lebesgue-integrability of $u$ for it to have finite or infinite improper Riemann-integrable?

I know for example that $\sin(x) / x$, $x \in (0,\infty)$ is improperly Riemann-integrable but not Lebesgue integrable. What's gone wrong here?

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

An improper Riemann integral is Lebesgue integrable if it is absolutely convergent. $\int_0^\infty \sin t/t\,dt$ is convergent but not absolutely convergent.

If a Lebesgue integrable function is also Rieman integrable, then its integral is absolutely Riemann convergent.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Don't forget that the same distinction applies to the improper Riemann integral on a bounded interval $[a,b]$. Everyone should know about the existence of a differentiable function $F$ with the property that $\int_0^1 F'(x)\,dx=F(1)-F(0)$ in the sense of the improper Riemann integral but not in the sense of the Lebesgue integral. $\endgroup$ – B. S. Thomson Oct 29 '15 at 15:38

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.