0
$\begingroup$

I'm having a look at intuitionistic approach to mathematics, and stumbled upon a derivation of Russell's Paradox that doesn't use the LEM. (Why did mathematicians take Russell's paradox seriously?) What was the Intuitionistic response to this? How did they overcome Russell's paradox? Cheers!

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.