I'm having a look at intuitionistic approach to mathematics, and stumbled upon a derivation of Russell's Paradox that doesn't use the LEM. (Why did mathematicians take Russell's paradox seriously?) What was the Intuitionistic response to this? How did they overcome Russell's paradox? Cheers!


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.