I'm looking for the convolution of $\mathcal{X}_{[0,1/2]}$ and $\mathcal{X}_{[0,1]}$ and I'm having trouble.

$\begin{align} \int \mathcal{X}_{[0,1]}(s)\mathcal{X}_{[0,1/2]}(t-s)ds = \int_0^{1/2}\mathcal{X}_{[0,1]}(t-s)ds \end{align}$

Variable sub. $u=t-s, du = -ds$, range becomes $u \in [t-1/2,t]$:

$\begin{align} \int_{t-1/2}^{t}\mathcal{X}_{[0,1]}(u)du \end{align}$

I guess here is where my mistake comes in. I feel this should be $t \cdot I\{t\in [0,1]\} - t \cdot I\{t \in [0.5,1.5]\}$. This is not correct, surely...


You can compute the integral $$ f(t) = \int_{t-1/2}^{t}\chi_{[0,1]}(u)du $$ in cases, for different ranges of $t$. I think it's easier (personally) if we manipulate the rectangular pulse function instead of doing the substitution for $u$. I'm assuming that $$ \chi_{[a,b]}(x) = \begin{cases} \hfill 1 \hfill & \text{ if } x\in [a,b] \\ \hfill 0 \hfill & \text{ if } x\notin [a,b] \\ \end{cases}. $$ With this, we can see that \begin{align} \chi_{[0,1]}(t-s) &= \begin{cases} \hfill 1 \hfill & \text{ if } t-s\in [0,1] \\ \hfill 0 \hfill & \text{ if } t-s\notin [0,1] \\ \end{cases} \\ &= \begin{cases} \hfill 1 \hfill & \text{ if } s\in [t-1,t] \\ \hfill 0 \hfill & \text{ if } s\notin [t-1,t] \\ \end{cases} \\ &= \chi_{[t-1,t]}(s). \end{align} So we have, $$ f(t) = \int_{0}^{1/2}\chi_{[0,1]}(t-s)ds = \int_{0}^{1/2}\chi_{[t-1,t]}(s)ds. $$ For $t\leq 0$, $\chi_{[t-1,t]} = 0$ in the range of integration, so $f(t) = 0$.

For $t\in (0,\frac{1}{2}]$, $f(t) = \int_{0}^{t}1 ds = t$.

For $t \in (\frac{1}{2},1)$, $f(t) = \int_{0}^{1/2}1 ds = \frac{1}{2}$.

For $t \in [1,\frac{3}{2})$, $f(t) = \int_{t-1}^{1/2}1 ds = \frac{1}{2} - (t-1) = \frac{3}{2} - t$.

For $t \geq \frac{3}{2}$, $f(t) = 0$.

Visually, the function $f(t)$ looks like a trapezoid. It's the amount of overlap between the two rectangular pulses as you slide them over one another (with the variable $t$). The overlap takes on a constant value of $\frac{1}{2}$ when the small rectangle is completely inside the larger rectangle.

  • $\begingroup$ Elegantly explained. $\endgroup$ – Benjamin Lindqvist Oct 23 '15 at 21:19

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.